Souto-Maior, Juliana RaposoPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]De Luna Gomes, Jéssica Marcela [UNESP]Araújo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido [UNESP]Santiago Júnior, Joel FerreiraDo Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro CavalcantiDe Moraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas2020-12-122020-12-122019-01-01Journal of Oral Implantology, v. 45, n. 4, p. 334-340, 2019.1548-13360160-6972http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201190We aimed to conduct an analysis of the systematic reviews (SRs) in literature about the implant survival rate (ISR) and marginal bone loss (MBL) in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. This work was registered in The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018095314) and was developed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Cochrane Library Handbook. A search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and LILACS. The PICO (problem/patient/population, intervention/indicator, comparison, outcome) question was ‘‘Do the survival rates of dental implants and marginal bone loss differ between diabetic and nondiabetic patients?’’ A total of 130 articles were retrieved. After eliminating repetitions, 118 were reviewed. Finally, 6 SRs were included. All the reviews indicated that there is no effect of diabetes on the ISR; however, a negative effect of the disease can be observed in MBL. Analysis of the quality of the studies was performed using the assessment of SRs in dentistry (Glenny Scale) and Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). Glenny Scale showed a moderate to high quality of the included studies. In contrast, AMSTAR 2 pointed out a critically low level for 4 studies, with no study fulfilling the criteria for high quality. It may be concluded that there is no effect of diabetes on the ISR; however, a negative effect of the disease can be observed on MBL.334-340engDental implantDiabetesOverviewSystematic reviewArtigo10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-000872-s2.0-85072509830