Pourakbari Kasmaei, M. [UNESP]Rider, M. J. [UNESP]Mantovani, J. R S [UNESP]2014-05-272014-05-272013-08-1912th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, EEEIC 2013, p. 335-340.http://hdl.handle.net/11449/76288This paper proposes a straightforward compromising method to determine the output power of all committed units during the scheduling time horizon. Unlike the conventional methods that work based on a constant pollution control cost (CPCC), this method works based on the system topology such as demand, minimum cost and minimum output emission of the system. In order to have a meaningful compromise between costs and emission in economic and emission dispatch (EED) problem, a flexible pollution control cost (FPCC) is proposed. Also a dynamic economic emission dispatch (DEED) approach is considered where the ramping constraints couple the scheduling hours; the inclusion of valve-point effect makes the DEED modeling more practical. The validity and effectiveness of the unproblematic FPCC approach is verified through an IEEE 30-bus test system with 6 unit for the 6-hour scheduling horizon. © 2013 IEEE.335-340engdynamic dispatcheconomic and emission dispatchramp rate limitvalve-point effectConventional methodsDynamic dispatchDynamic economic emission dispatch (DEED)Economic and emission dispatchRamp rate limitsRamping constraintSystem topologyValve point effectsElectrical engineeringPollution induced corrosionSchedulingCostsTrabalho apresentado em evento10.1109/EEEIC.2013.6549538Acesso aberto2-s2.0-848814412530614021283361265