De Almeida, Juliano Milanezi [UNESP]Matheus, Henrique Rinaldi [UNESP]Rodrigues Gusman, David Jonathan [UNESP]Faleiros, Paula Lazilha [UNESP]Januário De Araújo, Nathália [UNESP]Noronha Novaes, Vivian Cristina [UNESP]2018-12-112018-12-112017-02-01Implant Dentistry, v. 26, n. 1, p. 137-144, 2017.1056-6163http://hdl.handle.net/11449/168919Objective: This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment associated with different adjuvant therapies on periimplantitis. Materials and Methods: Different individuals, following a research process, performed a network research of controlled and randomized controlled clinical trials on PubMed, Embase/MEDLINE, with 20 years' time constraint and the last search in January 2016. Results: From 108 articles found by the first search, they analyzed 10 full texts, and in none did they find a standard control group. When compared, mechanical therapies combined with adjuvant therapy decreased prevalence of periimplant ratios; however, some groups showed unsatisfactory results, mainly related to the probing depth and bleeding index. When comparing debridement with other nonsurgical therapies (Er:YAG, Vector, air abrasive with amino acid glycine powder), increased periimplant levels were noticed in the test and control groups, although in different periods. Conclusion: Despite the improvement in the periimplant indices, there is no sufficient evidence to score the best results or even to choose the best association for nonsurgical treatment of periimplantitis; hence, more trials are necessary to answer this question.137-144engdental implantsinfection controlperiimplant diseasestreatment outcomeResenha10.1097/ID.0000000000000469Acesso restrito2-s2.0-84983504312