Fragoso, Jose M. V.Goncalves, Fernando [UNESP]Oliveira, Luiz F. B.Overman, HanLevi, TaalSilvius, Kirsten M.2020-12-102020-12-102019-10-30Plos One. San Francisco: Public Library Science, v. 14, n. 10, 17 p., 2019.1932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/11449/194965We compared the distribution and occurrence of 15 carnivore species with data collected monthly over three years by trained native trackers using both sign surveys and an encounter-based, visual-distance method in a well-preserved region of southern Guyana (Amazon / Guiana Shield). We found that a rigorously applied sign-based method was sufficient to describe the status of most carnivore species populations, including rare species such as jaguar and bush dog. We also found that even when accumulation curves for direct visual encounter data reached an asymptote, customarily an indication that sufficient sampling has occurred to describe populations, animal occurrence and distribution were grossly underestimated relative to the results of sign data. While other researchers have also found that sign are better than encounters or camera traps for large felids, our results are important in documenting the failure of even intensive levels of effort to raise encounter rates sufficiently to enable statistical analysis, and in describing the relationship between encounter and sign data for an entire community of carnivores including felids, canids, procyonids, and mustelids.17engArtigo10.1371/journal.pone.0223922WOS:000495703800001