Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]Nicolau, Eliane IguchiMazaro, José Vitor Quinelli [UNESP]Santos, Daniela Micheline dos [UNESP]Vedovatto, EduardoZavanelli, Adriana Cristina [UNESP]Gennari Filho, Humberto [UNESP]Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]2013-09-302014-05-202013-09-302014-05-202010-01-01Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 21, n. 1, p. 160-164, 2010.1049-2275http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15352During the process of facial rehabilitation, the mobility of ocular prostheses must be considered. Whereas some factors depend exclusively on the dentist, such as molding techniques and selection of material for denture construction, regarding ocular rehabilitation, factors, such as type of surgery, whether to adopt implants, and the use of lubricants, deserve special attention owing to their integration and their association with other factors pertaining exclusively to the patient. To establish harmony, and with the intention of aiding the dentist, after a discerning evaluation, the authors of this study report the factors that provide greater or less mobility to ocular prostheses and conceal the prosthesis in a more natural way, thereby contributing toward achieving a favorable aesthetic result in rehabilitations.160-164engArtificial eyeprosthesesimplantssatisfactionMobility, Aesthetic, Implants, and Satisfaction of the Ocular Prostheses WearersArtigo10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cfe898WOS:000273902400037Acesso restrito97198838148725828942804819076392533520817193580255813641935255000000-0002-3800-30500000-0003-1781-1953