Valenca-Silva, Graziela [UNESP]Braz, Mariana G. [UNESP]Barreto, Rodrigo E. [UNESP]Salvadori, Daisy M. F. [UNESP]Volpato, Gilson L. [UNESP]2014-12-032014-12-032014-03-01Transactions Of The American Fisheries Society. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Inc, v. 143, n. 2, p. 414-419, 2014.0002-8487http://hdl.handle.net/11449/113250We demonstrate the efficacy of propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) as an anesthetic when administered to fish in an immersion bath and show the absence of genetic side effects following short-term exposure to the drug. All tested fish were anesthetized (as indicated by loss of posture and lack of response to physical stimulation), and both the comet assay (tail intensity) and the micronucleus assay revealed that propofol does not induce primary DNA damage or chromosome damage in the fish Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Our results should be considered in light of our particular test conditions, including the water temperature (similar to 25 degrees C), the life stage and size of the fish, and the single exposure to the anesthetic. We suggest that propofol is a promising anesthetic in terms of its lack of genotoxic effects, at least in low dosages in adult Nile Tilapia.Received June 25, 2013; accepted October 15, 2013414-419engLow Dose of the Anesthetic Propofol Does Not Induce Genotoxic or Mutagenic Effects in Nile TilapiaArtigo10.1080/00028487.2013.856814WOS:000333882800010Acesso restrito0000-0003-4413-226X