Pelógia, Fernanda [UNESP]Valandro, Luiz FelipeBrigagão, ViniciusNeisser, Maximiliano PieroBottino, Marco A. [UNESP]2014-05-272014-05-272007-09-01International Journal of Prosthodontics, v. 20, n. 5, p. 532-534, 2007.0893-2174http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69865This study aimed to compare the microtensile bond strength of resin cement to alumina-reinforced feldspathic ceramic submitted to acid etching or chairside tribochemical silica coating. Ten blocks of Vitadur-α were randomly divided into 2 groups according to conditioning method: (1) etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid or (2) chairside tribochemical silica coating. Each ceramic block was luted to the corresponding resin composite block with the resin cement (Panavia F). Next, bar specimens were produced for microtensile testing. No significant difference was observed between the 2 experimental groups (Student t test, P> .05). Both surface treatments showed similar microtensile bond strength values.532-534engaluminum silicatefeldsparPanavia FluoroPanavia-Fluoropotassium derivativeresinresin cementsilane derivativesilicon dioxideunclassified drugcomparative studydental acid etchingdental bondingdental caredental surgerymethodologytensile strengthtooth prosthesisAcid Etching, DentalAir Abrasion, DentalAluminum SilicatesComposite ResinsDental BondingDental PorcelainDental Stress AnalysisPotassium CompoundsResin CementsSilanesSilicon DioxideTensile StrengthArtigoWOS:000250384600016Acesso restrito2-s2.0-349488212979234456003563666