Banks-Leite, CristinaPardini, RenataTambosi, Leandro R.Pearse, William D.Bueno, Adriana A.Bruscagin, Roberta T.Condez, Thais H. [UNESP]Dixo, MariannaIgari, Alexandre T.Martensen, Alexandre C.Metzger, Jean Paul2015-10-212015-10-212015-02-13Science. Washington: Amer Assoc Advancement Science, v. 347, n. 6223, p. 1-1, 2015.0036-8075http://hdl.handle.net/11449/128778Finney claims that we did not include transaction costs while assessing the economic costs of a set-aside program in Brazil and that accounting for them could potentially render large payments for environmental services (PES) projects unfeasible. We agree with the need for a better understanding of transaction costs but provide evidence that they do not alter the feasibility of the set-aside scheme we proposed.1-1engResponse to comment on "Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot"Editorial10.1126/science.aaa1602WOS:000349221300037Acesso restrito