Controle de qualidade em microfiltração marginal
Carregando...
Data
2011-07-20
Autores
Alvarenga, Fábio Augusto De Santi [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
Objetivo: O objetivo principal deste estudo foi verificar a reprodutibilidade e validade do diagnóstico de microinfiltração marginal visual e digital, estabelecendo, a priori, a resolução e magnificação mais indicadas para a modalidade digital. Métodos: Para o diagnóstico da microinfiltração marginal, os métodos utilizados foram o visual (estereomicroscópio) e o digital (Image Tool Software-ITS3.0), sendo as leituras realizadas por dois examinadores previamente calibrados. Foi estimada a concordância intra/interexaminador e foi estudada a validade da imagem digital para diagnóstico, tomando-se o esteremicroscópio como critério de validação. Para o uso da imagem digital, foram comparadas diferentes resoluções e magnificações. Resultados: A detecção da microinfiltração por meio digital (ITS3.0) deve ser feita na resolução 600 dpi, com diferença estatisticamente significativa entre as magnificações de 100%, 200%, 300% e 400% (H=13,34; p<0,05), sendo que as de 200% e de 300% apresentaram comportamento semelhante. Ambos os métodos visual e digital ofereceram altos níveis de reprodutibilidade intraobservador (visual: 1=0,87 e 2=0,76; digital: 1=0,99 e 2=0,99) e interobservador (visual: =0,84; =0,99). Tomando-se o estereomicroscópio como critério de validação, a acurácia do ITS3.0 foi verificada, com sensibilidade de 0,95 e especificidade de 0,92. Conclusões: Em relação à microinfiltração marginal: Ao se empregar o sistema digital ITS3.0, deve-se adotar as magnificações de 200% ou de 300% na resolução de 600 dpi. Os métodos de diagnóstico da microinfiltração marginal visual e digital mostraram-se reprodutíveis. Considerando o estereomicroscópio como critério de validação, o método digital ITS3.0 se mostrou sensível e específico
Objective: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and the accuracy of the marginal microleakage diagnosis, by means of visual and digital methods, establishing the ideal resolution and magnification for digital images. Methods: In relation to the marginal microleakage diagnosis, by means of visual (stereomicroscope) and digital (Image Tool Software-ITS3.0) methods, two observers previously calibrated did the diagnosis, independently. It was estimated the intra/interobserver agreement and it was studied the validity of the digital image (using the stereomicroscope as the validation criterion). Also, it was verified the ideal resolution and magnification for digital image diagnosis. Results: Using the Image Tool Software (ITS3.0), the magnification levels of 100%, 200%, 300%, and 400% showed to be different (H=13.34; p<0.05), and 200% and 300% were similar and are indicated to detect microleakage at 600 dpi. The visual method was reliable, with high levels of intraobserver agreement (1=0.87, and 2=0.76) as the interobserver agreement (=0.84); for ITS3.0, the intraobserver was almost perfect for both examiners (1=2=0.99) and so was the interobserver agreement value (=0.99). The accuracy of the ITS3.0 was verified, using the stereomicroscope as the validation criterion, with sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.92 Conclusions: In relation to microleakage, its detection by means of digital image (ITS3.0) showed that 200% and 300% magnification levels are indicated in the 600dpi resolution. The diagnosis of marginal microleakage using visual and digital methods presented high levels of intra- and interobserver agreement. Using the stereomicroscope as the validation criterion, digital diagnosis by ITS3.0 was sensitive and specific
Objective: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and the accuracy of the marginal microleakage diagnosis, by means of visual and digital methods, establishing the ideal resolution and magnification for digital images. Methods: In relation to the marginal microleakage diagnosis, by means of visual (stereomicroscope) and digital (Image Tool Software-ITS3.0) methods, two observers previously calibrated did the diagnosis, independently. It was estimated the intra/interobserver agreement and it was studied the validity of the digital image (using the stereomicroscope as the validation criterion). Also, it was verified the ideal resolution and magnification for digital image diagnosis. Results: Using the Image Tool Software (ITS3.0), the magnification levels of 100%, 200%, 300%, and 400% showed to be different (H=13.34; p<0.05), and 200% and 300% were similar and are indicated to detect microleakage at 600 dpi. The visual method was reliable, with high levels of intraobserver agreement (1=0.87, and 2=0.76) as the interobserver agreement (=0.84); for ITS3.0, the intraobserver was almost perfect for both examiners (1=2=0.99) and so was the interobserver agreement value (=0.99). The accuracy of the ITS3.0 was verified, using the stereomicroscope as the validation criterion, with sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.92 Conclusions: In relation to microleakage, its detection by means of digital image (ITS3.0) showed that 200% and 300% magnification levels are indicated in the 600dpi resolution. The diagnosis of marginal microleakage using visual and digital methods presented high levels of intra- and interobserver agreement. Using the stereomicroscope as the validation criterion, digital diagnosis by ITS3.0 was sensitive and specific
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Microinfiltração marginal (Odontologia) Diagnóstico, Infiltração dentária, Marginal microleakage diagnosis (Odontology), Dental infiltration
Como citar
ALVARENGA, Fábio Augusto De Santi. Controle de qualidade em microfiltração marginal. 2011. 68 f. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista - Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara, 2011.