Difusão transdentinária e citotoxicidade de sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2007-07-06
Autores
Lanza, Célia Regina Moreira [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
Este estudo avaliou a difusão transdentinária e a toxicidade de sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes de diferentes valores de pH sobre células odontoblastóides MDPC-23. Sessenta discos de dentina (0,4 mm de espessura) foram obtidos de terceiros molares humanos hígidos e divididos em 6 grupos após a mensuração de sua condutância hidráulica pelo Flodec. Os discos foram montados em câmaras pulpares in vitro, onde 30.000 células foram plantadas no seu lado pulpar (área dentina exposta 0,28 cm2) e mantidas em cultura por 48 h. Após este período, os sistemas adesivos Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, Adper Prompt e Xeno III foram aplicados no lado oclusal dos discos. O sistema adesivo Single Bond foi usado como controle positivo e a solução tampão fosfato como controle negativo. A citotoxicidade foi avaliada após 24 horas pelo teste MTT e a morfologia celular por MEV. A difusão transdentinária foi qualificada por CG/EM. Os valores de MTT para os sistemas autocondicionantes, analisados pelos testes de Kruskall-Wallis e Mann-Whitney, foram estatisticamente diferentes do grupo controle negativo. Houve redução da viabilidade celular de 47,8%; 46,5%; 42,1% e 28,0% para o Clearfil SE Bond, Xeno III, Clearfil Protect Bond e Adper Prompt L-Pop, respectivamente. A redução da viabilidade celular foi inferior ao Single Bond (53,1%) para todos os sistemas. A análise por CG/MS identificou o HEMA como principal componente químico difundido pela dentina. Foi possível concluir que todos os sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes avaliados apresentaram difusão transdentinária resultando em redução do metabolismo celular, a qual não foi relacionada a sua capacidade de dissolução da smear layer e desmineralização da dentina subjancente.
This study evaluated the transdentinal diffusion and cytotoxicity of self-etching adhesive systems with different pH on the odontoblast cell line MDPC-23. Sixty dentin disks were cut from the crowns of extracted human permanent molar teeth with 0.4 mm thickness and were divided into 6 groups of similar hydraulic conductance (Flodec). The dentin disks were placed in an in vitro pulp chamber and 30.000 cells were planted on their pulpal side (area of exposed dentin 0.28 cm2). After 48 hours, the adhesive systems Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, Adper Prompt or Xeno III were applied on the occlusal side and light-cured for 10s. Single Bond was used as positive and phosphate buffer solution (PBS) as negative control group. The cytotoxicity was measured by MTT assay and cell characteristics were assessed by SEM, after 24 h. The transdentinal diffusion was qualified by GC/MS. Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests demonstrated a significant difference among the adhesives and PBS (p<0.05). The cellular viability reduction promoted by the self-etching systems was lower than that of Single Bond (53,1%). Cell metabolism was reduced in 47,8%; 46,5%; 42,1% and 28,0% for Clearfil SE Bond, Xeno III, Clearfil Protect Bond and Adper Prompt, respectively. HEMA was identified as the main diffused component. It was concluded that all investigated self-etching adhesives demonstrated transdentinal diffusion resulting in reduction of the cellular metabolism, which was not related to their capacity to dissolve the smear layer and demineralize the underlying dentin.
This study evaluated the transdentinal diffusion and cytotoxicity of self-etching adhesive systems with different pH on the odontoblast cell line MDPC-23. Sixty dentin disks were cut from the crowns of extracted human permanent molar teeth with 0.4 mm thickness and were divided into 6 groups of similar hydraulic conductance (Flodec). The dentin disks were placed in an in vitro pulp chamber and 30.000 cells were planted on their pulpal side (area of exposed dentin 0.28 cm2). After 48 hours, the adhesive systems Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, Adper Prompt or Xeno III were applied on the occlusal side and light-cured for 10s. Single Bond was used as positive and phosphate buffer solution (PBS) as negative control group. The cytotoxicity was measured by MTT assay and cell characteristics were assessed by SEM, after 24 h. The transdentinal diffusion was qualified by GC/MS. Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests demonstrated a significant difference among the adhesives and PBS (p<0.05). The cellular viability reduction promoted by the self-etching systems was lower than that of Single Bond (53,1%). Cell metabolism was reduced in 47,8%; 46,5%; 42,1% and 28,0% for Clearfil SE Bond, Xeno III, Clearfil Protect Bond and Adper Prompt, respectively. HEMA was identified as the main diffused component. It was concluded that all investigated self-etching adhesives demonstrated transdentinal diffusion resulting in reduction of the cellular metabolism, which was not related to their capacity to dissolve the smear layer and demineralize the underlying dentin.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Dentina, Adesivos dentinários, Cromatografia gasosa, Cultura em câmara de difusão, Dentin, Diffusion chambers, Cell culture techniques, Odontoblasts, Gas cromatography, Mass spectrometry, Self-etching adhesive systems
Como citar
LANZA, Célia Regina Moreira. Difusão transdentinária e citotoxicidade de sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes. 2007. 150 p. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de odontologia de Araraquara, 2007.