Resistência de união e discrepância marginal absoluta de infraestruturas feitas em cerâmica Y-TZP: influência de novos métodos de tratamento de superfície
Carregando...
Data
2011-06-02
Autores
Vanderlei, Aleska Dias [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes tratamentos de superfície da cerâmica Y-TZP na resistência de união, durabilidade e discrepância marginal. Para os testes de resistência adesiva, foram obtidos 144 corpos de prova (cp) da cerâmica VITA In-Ceram YZ for InLab (5,25 x 3,75 x 4,5 mm), que foram divididos em 6 grupos (G) (n=24), conforme o tratamento de superfície: G1: sem tratamento (controle); G2: jateamento com partículas de alumínio revestidas por sílica (CoJet®-Sand, 3M ESPE AG) (silicatização); G3: vitrificação 1 (Glaze Spray VITA AKZENT), condicionamento com ácido fluorídrico (HF) (1 min); G4: vitrificação 1 (Glaze Spray VITA AKZENT), silicatização; G5: vitrificação 2 (Glaze VITA AKZENT), condicionamento com HF (1 min); G6: vitrificação 2 (Glaze VITA AKZENT), silicatização. Após todos os tratamentos, as superfícies foram silanizadas por 5 min (ESPE-SIL) e a cimentação com Panavia F (Kuraray) foi realizada. Metade dos espécimes de cada tratamento foi ensaiada 24h após cimentação (SECO), a outra metade foi submetida à armazenagem (150 dias) e termociclagem (12.000x) (TC), e então realizado o ensaio de cisalhamento (1 mm/min). G7: G1+TC; G8: G2+TC; G9: G3+TC; G10: G4+TC; G11: G5+TC; G12: G6+TC. Superfícies tratadas foram analisadas por perfilometria óptica 3D para obtenção dos dados de rugosidade (Ra) e microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV) (1000x). Análise por energia dispersiva de raio-X (EDS) foi realizada para determinar os elementos químicos presentes na superfície de cada grupo. Para a análise de adaptação marginal foram confeccionadas 60 infraestruturas (adaptadas em um troquel metálico) nas quais foram realizados os mesmos tratamentos de superfície
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments of Y-TZP ceramic on bond durability and marginal fit. 144 specimens of VITA In-Ceram YZ for InLab ceramic (5.25 x 3.75 x 4.5 mm) were obtained and divided into 6 groups (n=24) according to the surface treatment: G1: no treatment (control); G2: chairside tribochemical silica coating system (CoJet®-Sand, 3M ESPE AG) (Cojet); G3: vitrification 1 (Glaze Spray VITA AKZENT), conditioning with hydrofluoric acid (HF) (1 minute); G4: vitrification 1 (Glaze Spray VITA AKZENT), Cojet; G5: vitrification 2 (Glaze VITA AKZENT), conditioning with HF (1 minute); G6: vitification 2 (Glaze VITA AKZENT), Cojet. Then, the ceramic surfaces were silanized and the cementPanavia F (Kuraray) was applied. Half of the specimens from each treatment was tested 24 hours after cementation (DRY), the remaining specimens were stored in distilled water for150 days,thermocycled(12,000x) (AGING) and then the shear test was performed (1mm/minute). Conditioned surfaces were evaluated by 3D optical profilometry in order to obtain roughness data (Ra) and analysed by scan electronic microscopy (SEM) (1000x). Analysis by energy x-ray dispersive (EDS) was performed to determine the chemical elements present in each surface group. For analysis of marginal adaptation 60 crowns were produced (adapted into a metal die) and the same surface treatments were carried out on the internal surface of the crowns. The data were analysed using. The results suggest the vitrification 1 and vitrification 2 groups showed the highest bond strength compared to the control group. The highest marginal discrepancies were observed in the vitrification groups (117.36±29.61 to 105.78±12.23) comparing with the other groups (55.29±8.71 and 55.04±8.55).
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments of Y-TZP ceramic on bond durability and marginal fit. 144 specimens of VITA In-Ceram YZ for InLab ceramic (5.25 x 3.75 x 4.5 mm) were obtained and divided into 6 groups (n=24) according to the surface treatment: G1: no treatment (control); G2: chairside tribochemical silica coating system (CoJet®-Sand, 3M ESPE AG) (Cojet); G3: vitrification 1 (Glaze Spray VITA AKZENT), conditioning with hydrofluoric acid (HF) (1 minute); G4: vitrification 1 (Glaze Spray VITA AKZENT), Cojet; G5: vitrification 2 (Glaze VITA AKZENT), conditioning with HF (1 minute); G6: vitification 2 (Glaze VITA AKZENT), Cojet. Then, the ceramic surfaces were silanized and the cementPanavia F (Kuraray) was applied. Half of the specimens from each treatment was tested 24 hours after cementation (DRY), the remaining specimens were stored in distilled water for150 days,thermocycled(12,000x) (AGING) and then the shear test was performed (1mm/minute). Conditioned surfaces were evaluated by 3D optical profilometry in order to obtain roughness data (Ra) and analysed by scan electronic microscopy (SEM) (1000x). Analysis by energy x-ray dispersive (EDS) was performed to determine the chemical elements present in each surface group. For analysis of marginal adaptation 60 crowns were produced (adapted into a metal die) and the same surface treatments were carried out on the internal surface of the crowns. The data were analysed using. The results suggest the vitrification 1 and vitrification 2 groups showed the highest bond strength compared to the control group. The highest marginal discrepancies were observed in the vitrification groups (117.36±29.61 to 105.78±12.23) comparing with the other groups (55.29±8.71 and 55.04±8.55).
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Cerâmica odontológica, Vitrificação (Ceramica), Discrepância marginal, Ceramic surfaces
Como citar
VANDERLEI, Aleska Dias. Resistência de união e discrepância marginal absoluta de infraestruturas feitas em cerâmica Y-TZP: influência de novos métodos de tratamento de superfície. 2011. 103 f. Tese (doutorado) – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Odontologia de São José dos Campos, 2011.