O processo de gestão pública da miséria
Data
2007-06-20
Autores
Barbosa, Marisa Geralda [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
Esta pesquisa objetiva analisar se os programas públicos nacionais de combate à fome e à miséria, como o Programa Comunidade Solidária e os programas de transferência de renda, dos governos do presidente Fernando Henrique Cardoso, alcançaram seus objetivos. Esses programas foram uma resposta aos ajustes estruturais promovidos pela adoção de políticas neoliberais, que atingiram, sobretudo, os mais pobres. Todos esses programas adotaram o princípio da focalização, buscando melhor administrar as finanças públicas e atingir, de forma efetiva, os pobres e indigentes. Enquanto o Programa Comunidade Solidária tinha um forte apelo à solidariedade, como valor que sensibilizaria toda a sociedade contra fome, a defesa da educação e da cidadania eram centrais nos programas de transferência de renda . Entretanto, à luz da teoria e metodologia marxianas, esses programas não eliminaram e nem mesmo reduziram, de forma significativa, a fome e a miséria, uma vez que se revelaram assistencialistas, compensatórios, residuais e descontínuos. Além disso, caminharam na contramão da universalização dos direitos, uma vez que o Estado tem transferido a responsabilidade com o social para o chamado terceiro setor. A filantropia, a cidadania e a política não foram capazes de eliminar a fome, em razão dos seus próprios limites ontológicos. Esses programas apenas disciplinaram, controlaram e administraram a miséria, sem perspectiva de superá-la.
This research aims to analyze whether the national public programs to combat hunger and poverty, such as the Solidary Community Program and the income transferring programs, of president Fernando Henrique Cardoso governments, reached their objectives or not. These programs came as a response to the structural adjusts promoted by the adoption of neo-liberal politics, reaching the poorest people above all. All those programs adopted focalization, as a principle, looking for better administration of the public finances and to effectively reach the poor people and the indigents. While the Solidary Community Program had a strong appeal to solidarity, as a value that would sensitize the whole society against hunger, the defense of Education; and of citizenship as being central to income transferring programs. However, in the light the Marxian theory and methodology, those programs did not eliminate and did not even significantly reduced hunger and poverty, since assistencialism revealed to be compensatory, residual and discontinuous. Besides, they moved against the universalization of Rights, once the State has been transferring the social responsibility for the so-called third section. Philanthropy, citizenship and politics were not capable to eliminate hunger, due to its inherent ontological limits. These programs just disciplined, controlled and administered the poverty, without perspective of overcoming it.
This research aims to analyze whether the national public programs to combat hunger and poverty, such as the Solidary Community Program and the income transferring programs, of president Fernando Henrique Cardoso governments, reached their objectives or not. These programs came as a response to the structural adjusts promoted by the adoption of neo-liberal politics, reaching the poorest people above all. All those programs adopted focalization, as a principle, looking for better administration of the public finances and to effectively reach the poor people and the indigents. While the Solidary Community Program had a strong appeal to solidarity, as a value that would sensitize the whole society against hunger, the defense of Education; and of citizenship as being central to income transferring programs. However, in the light the Marxian theory and methodology, those programs did not eliminate and did not even significantly reduced hunger and poverty, since assistencialism revealed to be compensatory, residual and discontinuous. Besides, they moved against the universalization of Rights, once the State has been transferring the social responsibility for the so-called third section. Philanthropy, citizenship and politics were not capable to eliminate hunger, due to its inherent ontological limits. These programs just disciplined, controlled and administered the poverty, without perspective of overcoming it.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Sociologia, Solidariedade, Brasil Fome
Como citar
BARBOSA, Marisa Geralda. O processo de gestão pública da miséria. 2007. 206 f. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências e Letras de Araraquara, 2007.