Use of Stress Analysis Methods to Evaluate the Biomechanics of Oral Rehabilitation With Implants
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2014-04-01
Autores
Pesqueira, Aldieris Alves [UNESP]
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
Gennari Filho, Humberto [UNESP]
Monteiro, Douglas Roberto [UNESP]
Santos, Daniela Micheline dos [UNESP]
Haddad, Marcela Filie
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Allen Press Inc
Resumo
Because the biomechanical behavior of dental implants is different from that of natural tooth, clinical problems may occur. The mechanism of stress distribution and load transfer to the implant/bone interface is a critical issue affecting the success rate of implants. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a brief literature review of the available stress analysis methods to study implant-supported prosthesis loading and to discuss their contributions in the biomechanical evaluation of oral rehabilitation with implants. Several studies have used experimental, analytical, and computational models by means of finite element models (FEM), photoelasticity, strain gauges and associations of these methods to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of dental implants. The FEM has been used to evaluate new components, configurations, materials, and shapes of implants. The greatest advantage of the photoelastic method is the ability to visualize the stresses in complex structures, such as oral structures, and to observe the stress patterns in the whole model, allowing the researcher to localize and quantify the stress magnitude. Strain gauges can be used to assess in vivo and in vitro stress in prostheses, implants, and teeth. Some authors use the strain gauge technique with photoelasticity or FEM techniques. These methodologies can be widely applied in dentistry, mainly in the research field. Therefore, they can guide further research and clinical studies by predicting some disadvantages and streamlining clinical time.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
stress analysis methods, finite element analysis, photoelasticity, strain gauge, implants
Como citar
Journal Of Oral Implantology. Lawrence: Allen Press Inc, v. 40, n. 2, p. 217-228, 2014.