O recurso e o razoável
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2016-02-17
Autores
Padua, Átila de Andrade [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
Mormente sob o influxo do princípio da “duração razoável do processo” – anexo ao compromisso em assegurar “meios que garantam a celeridade de sua tramitação” –, foi proposta a renovação do processo civil brasileiro via código, consagrando a postura contemporânea dos tribunais. Refutada a crítica abstrata ao sistema recursal brasileiro, o trabalho busca analisar as reformulações deste segmento da sistemática processual, seu propósito e condições de possibilidade da jurisdição estatal. Norteado pela teoria geral dos recursos e pela preocupação no alcance de uma metodologia pós-positivista, o trabalho adentra a discussão política e constitucional da dogmática jurídica, indagando pelo preço democrático das supressões recursais. Nesse percurso, compreendida a relevância dos institutos do sistema recursal, são colocadas em xeque propostas como a adoção de filtros, o incidente de resolução de demandas repetitivas e um modelo de precedentes à brasileira. Portanto, como pano de fundo, o trabalho pretende desnudar os limites do redimensionamento sistemático dos recursos.
Especially by the influx of the "reasonable length of the proceeding" principle – attached to the commitment to ensure "means to guarantee the speed of its proceedings" – has been proposed a renewal of the Brazilian civil procedure by a code, consecrating the contemporary posture of the courts. Once the abstract criticism of the Brazilian appeal system was refused, this dissertation analyzes the reformulations of this segment of procedural systematic, its purpose and conditions of possibility of state jurisdiction. Guided by the general theory of recourses and the concern in reaching a post-positivist methodology, the work enters the political and constitutional discussion of legal doctrine, questioning the democratic price of the procedure remedies deletions. In the middle of the rummage, understood the significance of the appeal system institutes, put into question proposals as the adoption of filters, repetitive demands resolution and a Brazilian model of precedents. Therefore, as a backdrop, the study intends to expose the limits of systematic downsizing of recourses.
Especially by the influx of the "reasonable length of the proceeding" principle – attached to the commitment to ensure "means to guarantee the speed of its proceedings" – has been proposed a renewal of the Brazilian civil procedure by a code, consecrating the contemporary posture of the courts. Once the abstract criticism of the Brazilian appeal system was refused, this dissertation analyzes the reformulations of this segment of procedural systematic, its purpose and conditions of possibility of state jurisdiction. Guided by the general theory of recourses and the concern in reaching a post-positivist methodology, the work enters the political and constitutional discussion of legal doctrine, questioning the democratic price of the procedure remedies deletions. In the middle of the rummage, understood the significance of the appeal system institutes, put into question proposals as the adoption of filters, repetitive demands resolution and a Brazilian model of precedents. Therefore, as a backdrop, the study intends to expose the limits of systematic downsizing of recourses.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Processo civil, Recurso, Razoabilidade, Civil procedure, Appeal, Reasonably