Os Estados Unidos e o Órgão de Solução de Controvérsias (OSC) da OMC: Um estudo da participação dos EUA na criação e no uso do mecanismo
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2016-02-25
Autores
Preto, Carolina Cristina [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
Este trabalho tem como objetivos a) entender o contexto histórico e as motivações que levaram os Estados Unidos a propor uma reforma ambiciosa do mecanismo de solução de disputas comerciais do GATT e a apoiar a criação da OMC durante a Rodada Uruguai (1986-1994); e b) investigar a participação norte-americana no uso do sistema de resolução de disputas reformado que resultou das referidas negociações. Embora tenha sido fortemente advogada pelos EUA, a reforma do mecanismo foi descrita por alguns estudiosos como uma inovação institucional que reduziu a influência norte-americana sobre os processos de resolução de controvérsias, introduzindo maior igualdade às relações comerciais entre Estados com poderes assimétricos. Ao examinar o desempenho dos EUA em casos levados à OMC entre 1995 e 2013 e compará-lo com o de outros membros da instituição, tentamos avaliar a validade do argumento acima mencionado, como também, as posições de perspectivas teóricas opostas. Identificamos um padrão na participação dos EUA nos casos do OSC da OMC que é significativamente distinto do de outros membros da instituição, sugerindo que o país teve um desempenho mais favorável, principalmente nas fases iniciais das ações. A principal evidência encontrada nessa direção diz respeito à proporção de divergências que são solucionadas por meio de acordos entre as partes. Em comparação à média geral dos demais membros da instituição, os EUA se destacaram por obter um número elevado de acordos quando eram os reclamantes. Por outro lado, na condição de parte denunciada, o país se diferenciou por firmar uma porcentagem muito menor de acordos. Nesse sentido, os resultados obtidos em nosso estudo sugerem que, como era a situação no GATT, de forma geral, os EUA continuam mais capazes que outros atores de contestar com sucesso as políticas de seus parceiros comerciais pela via multilateral e, ao mesmo tempo, de minimizar alterações das suas próprias práticas.
This study aims a) to understand the historical context and the motivations that led the United States to propose an ambitious reform of the GATT trade dispute settlement mechanism and to support the establishment of the WTO during the Uruguay Round (1986-1994); and b) to investigate the US participation in the use of the reformed dispute settlement system that resulted from these negotiations. Despite being strongly advocated by the US, the reform of the mechanism has been described by some scholars as an institutional innovation that has significantly reduced the American influence on the process of resolving disputes, introducing greater equality in the trade relations between states with asymmetric powers. By examining the US performance in cases brought to the WTO between 1995 and 2013 and comparing it with that of other members of the institution, we try to assess the validity of the argument mentioned above as well as the positions of opposing theoretical perspectives. We identified a pattern in US participation in the WTO’s DSB cases that is significantly different from that of other members of the organization, suggesting that it had a more favorable performance, especially in the early stages of an action. The main evidence found in this direction regards the proportion of disputes that are resolved by an agreement between the parties involved. When compared to the general average of other members of the institution, the United States stood out for obtaining a large number of agreements when acting as plaintiffs. By contrast, in the position of the demanded party, it further differentiated itself by reaching a much smaller percentage of agreements. In this sense, the results obtained in our study suggest that, as was the situation in the GATT, the US remains generally more capable than other actors to successfully challenge the policies of its trading partners through the multilateral via and, at the same time, to minimize changes to its own practices.
This study aims a) to understand the historical context and the motivations that led the United States to propose an ambitious reform of the GATT trade dispute settlement mechanism and to support the establishment of the WTO during the Uruguay Round (1986-1994); and b) to investigate the US participation in the use of the reformed dispute settlement system that resulted from these negotiations. Despite being strongly advocated by the US, the reform of the mechanism has been described by some scholars as an institutional innovation that has significantly reduced the American influence on the process of resolving disputes, introducing greater equality in the trade relations between states with asymmetric powers. By examining the US performance in cases brought to the WTO between 1995 and 2013 and comparing it with that of other members of the institution, we try to assess the validity of the argument mentioned above as well as the positions of opposing theoretical perspectives. We identified a pattern in US participation in the WTO’s DSB cases that is significantly different from that of other members of the organization, suggesting that it had a more favorable performance, especially in the early stages of an action. The main evidence found in this direction regards the proportion of disputes that are resolved by an agreement between the parties involved. When compared to the general average of other members of the institution, the United States stood out for obtaining a large number of agreements when acting as plaintiffs. By contrast, in the position of the demanded party, it further differentiated itself by reaching a much smaller percentage of agreements. In this sense, the results obtained in our study suggest that, as was the situation in the GATT, the US remains generally more capable than other actors to successfully challenge the policies of its trading partners through the multilateral via and, at the same time, to minimize changes to its own practices.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Organização Mundial do Comércio (OMC), GATT, Estados Unidos – política comercial, World Trade Organization (WTO), United States - trade policy