Avaliação do processo de reparo em defeitos de calvária de ratos com membrana de celulose bacteriana e membrana de colágeno porcino: análise histológica, histométrica e imunoistoquímica
Carregando...
Data
2017-08-07
Autores
Pereira, Járede Carvalho [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
Este estudo objetivou avaliar a eficácia da membrana de celulose bacteriana (Nanoskin®) no reparo ósseo de defeitos críticos de 8mm em calota de ratos machos adultos quando comparada à membrana colágena Bio-Gide®. Foram utilizados 72 ratos machos adultos divididos em três grupos experimentais: grupo coágulo (GC), grupo Bio-Gide® (BG) e grupo chá verde (CV). Os períodos de estudo foram de 7, 14 30 e 60 dias após a criação do defeito cirúrgico e aposição da membrana. Foram realizadas a análise histológica, histométrica e imunoistoquímica. Foi possível observar que aos 30 e 60 dias de reparo, o grupo BG apresentou melhor preenchimento do defeito cirúrgico, com maior quantidade de tecido ósseo. Já o grupo CV apresentou preenchimento do defeito com grande quantidade de tecido conjuntivo maduro. Os dados obtidos na análise histométrica revelam que aos 30 e 60 dias a área de osso neoformado teve grande discrepância para o grupo BG em relação ao CV e GC (Teste de Tukey - P<0,001). Por outro lado, os resultados referentes à análise por imunistoquímica evidenciam marcações moderada e intensa para as proteínas osteocalcina (OC) e osteopontina (OP) tanto para o grupo BG quanto para o CV aos 60 dias de reparo. Pode-se concluir que apesar de a membrana de chá verde apresentar aspectos promissores no reparo de tecido mole, neste estudo não permitiu o reparo ósseo em calotas de ratos, quando comparada à Bio-Gide®.
The present study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of bacterial cellulose membrane (Nanoskin® ) in the bone repair of 8 mm critical-size defects in male adult rat calvaria compared to collagen membrane BioGide® . It was used 72 adult male rats divided into three experimental groups: Clot group (CG), Bio-Gide® group (BG) and bacterial cellulose group (BC). The study period were seven, 15, 30 and 60 days after the surgical defect and position of the membrane. It were performed the histologic, histometric and imunohistochemistry analysis and possible to observe that at 30 and 60 days, BG group showed higher filling of the surgical wound with higher amount of new formed bone. The BC group showed a mature connective tissue filling the defect. Data from histometric analysis showed that at 30 and 60 days the new bone formed area was discrepant for BG group compared with BC and CG group (Tukey test – P<0,001). On the other hands, immunohistochemistry analysis showed a moderate and intense immunolabeling of osteocalcin and osteopontin at 60 days of bone repair for BG and BC group. It was possible to conclude that despite the BC membrane showing promising aspects in the soft tissue repair, did not allow bone repair in rats calvaria, compared to BioGide®.
The present study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of bacterial cellulose membrane (Nanoskin® ) in the bone repair of 8 mm critical-size defects in male adult rat calvaria compared to collagen membrane BioGide® . It was used 72 adult male rats divided into three experimental groups: Clot group (CG), Bio-Gide® group (BG) and bacterial cellulose group (BC). The study period were seven, 15, 30 and 60 days after the surgical defect and position of the membrane. It were performed the histologic, histometric and imunohistochemistry analysis and possible to observe that at 30 and 60 days, BG group showed higher filling of the surgical wound with higher amount of new formed bone. The BC group showed a mature connective tissue filling the defect. Data from histometric analysis showed that at 30 and 60 days the new bone formed area was discrepant for BG group compared with BC and CG group (Tukey test – P<0,001). On the other hands, immunohistochemistry analysis showed a moderate and intense immunolabeling of osteocalcin and osteopontin at 60 days of bone repair for BG and BC group. It was possible to conclude that despite the BC membrane showing promising aspects in the soft tissue repair, did not allow bone repair in rats calvaria, compared to BioGide®.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Biomateriais, Xenoenxertos, Celulose, Biomaterials, Xengrafts, Cellulose