Order effects of high-intensity intermittent and strength exercise on lipoprotein profile
Carregando...
Data
2016-12-01
Autores
Diniz, Tiego Aparecido [UNESP]
Inoue, Daniela Sayuri [UNESP]
Rossi, Fabricio Eduardo [UNESP]
Panissa, Valéria Leme Gonçalves
Monteiro, Paula Alves [UNESP]
Lira, Fabio Santos [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
Purpose: To compare the effects of the order of concurrent exercise (endurance plus strength or strength plus endurance) on lipoprotein profiles in men. Methods: After the evaluation of maximum strength (one repetition maximum—1RM) in the half-squat and of aerobic fitness (maximal velocity in treadmill incremental test), 11 physically active male subjects underwent two randomized sessions composed of four sets of half-squat strength exercises until exhaustion (at 80 % of 1RM) and a 5-km run high-intensity intermittent exercise (1:1 min at Vmax), performed in different orders: (1) strength plus run (S-A) and inverse order, and run plus strength (A-S). Blood samples were collected before and immediately after the first exercise (Post-1) and after the second exercise (Post-2) in the intra-session sequence. Serum was analyzed for total cholesterol (TC) and its ratio, HDL-c and LDL-c, and triacylglycerol (TAG). Results: There were effects of condition for TC, LDL-c, and TC/HDL, with greater values in the AS than SA (p < 0.001 for all). For the delta analysis, there was an interaction effect for TAG, with greater delta-1 S-A than delta-1 A-S (p = 0.035), and higher delta-1 S-A than delta-2 S-A (p = 0.001); for LDL-c, with higher delta-1 S-A values than delta-2 S-A (p = 0.010); and for TC, with higher delta-1 S-A values than delta-2 S-A (p = 0.038). Conclusion: We conclude that there are no differences between the order of acute high-intensity intermittent run plus strength exercises regarding modulation of the lipoprotein profile in healthy, physically active men.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Aerobic exercise, Lipoprotein, Strength exercise
Como citar
Sport Sciences for Health, v. 12, n. 3, p. 353-359, 2016.