Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2005-04-01
Autores
Perdigão, Jorge
Carmo, André R.P.
Anauate-Netto, Camillo
Amore, Ricardo [UNESP]
Lewgoy, Hugo R.
Cordeiro, Hiram João D.
Dutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP]
Castilhos, Natália
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
Purpose: To test the null hypothesis that beveling and/or etching enamel would not affect the 18-month clinical performance of the self-etching adhesive Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCL). Methods: With Institutional Review Board approval, 34 patients were enrolled in this study. A total of 120 NCCL was selected and assigned to four groups: (1) CSEB was applied without any cavity preparation; (2) CSEB was applied after beveling enamel; (3) CSEB was applied after etching enamel for 15 seconds with 35% phosphoric acid; (4) CSEB was applied after beveling and etching enamel. A microfilled composite resin was used for all restorations. Results: At 6 months after initial placement, 120 restorations (a 100% recall rate) were evaluated. At 18 months, 87 restorations (a 72.5% recall rate) were available for evaluation. A survival rate of 100% was measured for all groups at both 6 and 18 months. Sensitivity to air decreased significantly only for Group 3 (no bevel+acid etch) from baseline to 18 months without statistical changes from 6 months to 18 months. None of the other parameters resulted in significant differences for any of the four groups. However, when data were pooled, both the overall marginal discoloration and the overall marginal adaptation were significantly worse at 18 months than at baseline, while sensitivity to air decreased significantly from baseline to 18 months. The 18-month survival rate of the self-etching adhesive Clearfil SE Bond was not improved by enamel bevel or by enamel etching. Both overall marginal adaptation and overall marginal discoloration were worse at 18 months than at baseline.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Como citar
American Journal of Dentistry, v. 18, n. 2, p. 135-140, 2005.