GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in poor ovarian responders: A meta-analysis
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2006-11-01
Autores
Franco, J. G.
Baruffi, R. L R
Mauri, A. L. [UNESP]
Petersen, C. G. [UNESP]
Felipe, V.
Cornicelli, J.
Cavagna, M.
Oliveira, J. B A
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of gonadotrophin antagonist (GnRH-ant) versus GnRH agonist (GnRHa) as coadjuvant therapy for ovarian stimulation in poor ovarian responders in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Search strategies included on-line surveys of databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE and others. A fixed effects model was used for odds ratio (OR) and effect size (weighted mean difference, WMD). Six trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria (randomized controlled trials). There was no difference between GnRH-ant and GnRHa (long and flare-up protocols) with respect to cycle cancellation rate, number of mature oocytes and clinical pregnancy rate per cycle initiated, per oocyte retrieval and per embryo transfer. When the mete-analysis was applied to the two trials that had used GnRH-ant versus long protocols of GnRHa, a significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes was observed in the GnRH-ant protocols [P = 0.018; WMD: 1.12 (0.18, 2.05)]. However, when the meta-analysis was applied to the four trials that had used GnRH-ant versus flare-up protocols, a significantly higher number of retrieved oocytes (P = 0.032; WMD: -0.51, 95% CI -0.99, -0.04) was observed in the GnRHa protocols. Nevertheless, additional randomized controlled trials with better planning are needed to confirm these results.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist, Ovarian, Poor responder, Stimulation, buserelin acetate, cetrorelix, chorionic gonadotropin, ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel, ganirelix, gonadorelin agonist, gonadorelin antagonist, human menopausal gonadotropin, leuprorelin, nordett, recombinant follitropin, triptorelin, urofollitropin, adjuvant therapy, clinical protocol, clinical trial, data base, drug efficacy, drug response, effect size, EMBASE, embryo transfer, fertilization in vitro, human, infertility therapy, information retrieval, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, MEDLINE, meta analysis, online system, oocyte maturation, ovary hyperstimulation, pregnancy rate, risk assessment, statistical analysis, systematic review, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Fertility Agents, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Humans, Infertility, Female, Odds Ratio, Ovulation Induction, Randomized Controlled Trials, Treatment Outcome
Como citar
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, v. 13, n. 5, p. 618-627, 2006.