Resistência de união de cimentos resinosos, ao cisalhamento, variando o substrato e o material restaurador
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2009-07-19
Autores
Ariki, Eurípedes Kaizo [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência de união ao cisalhamento de três diferentes tipos de agentes cimentantes: auto-condicionante (Panavia F / P), convencional (RelyX ARC - R) e auto-adesivo (RelyX U100 - U), usando dois tipos de substratos (esmalte / E e dentina / D) e dois tipos de materiais restauradores (cerâmica - C e resina composta laboratorial - R). Foram utilizados cento e vinte incisivos bovinos incluídos em resina acrílica, de modo que uma parte da face vestibular ficasse exposta. Os dentes foram desgastados até se obter uma área lisa e plana, de aproximadamente de 25 mm2, em metade dos espécimes foi exposto esmalte, na outra metade dentina. Uma fita adesiva com um orifício no centro com 3 mm de diâmetro foi colada sobre estas áreas, delimitando a área a ser usada no teste. Foram confeccionados sessenta cilindros de cerâmica a base de dissilicato de lítio (IPS e.max) e sessenta cilindros de resina composta (SR Adoro) com dimensões de 3mm de diâmetro e 3mm de altura. Os cilindros foram cimentados aos substratos com os três tipos de cimento resinoso, formando doze grupos experimentais: G1(PEC); G2(PER); G3(PDC); G4(PDR); G5(REC), G6(RER); G7(RDC); G8(RDR): G9(UEC); G10(UER); G11(UDC) e G12(UDR). Após um período de uma semana, os corpos-de-prova foram levados à máquina de ensaios universais para a realização do teste de cisalhamento com velocidade de 0,5 mm/min. Os resultados (foram submetidos à análise de variância e as médias comparadas pelo teste de Tukey em nível de 5% de significância. Verificou-se que o maior valor médio obtido foi do G5 (17,46 MPa) diferindo significativamente dos demais grupos, exceto do G1 (14,60 MPa). O G12 (1,03 MPa) apresentou o menor valor de resistência, não apresentando semelhança estatística com os outros grupos. A adesão em esmalte...
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three types of luting agents: self-etching (Panavia F, P), conventional (Rely X ARC, R) and self-adhesive (Rely X U100, U), using enamel (E) or dentin (D) as substrates and two types of restorative materials (ceramic, C and laboratorial composite, R). One hundred and twenty-five bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin leaving their bucal side exposed. The teeth were ground flat until a 5mm2 area was created. Half of the specimens had enamel exposed and the other half had dentin exposed. A piece of tape with a 3 mm hole was used to delimitate the bonding area. Sixty cylinders of ceramic (IPS E.max Press) and sixty of composite (SR Adoro), 3 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height, were confectioned. The cylinders were luted to the substrates, forming twelve groups: G1 (PEC); G2 (PER); G3 (PDC); G4 (PDR); G5 (REC), G6 (RER); G7 (RDC); G8(RDR): G9 (UEC); G10(UER); G11(UDC) and G12(UDR). After one week, the specimens were subjected to a shear test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0,5 mm/min. The results were submitted to both the Anova and Tukey tests (p<0.05) for statistical analysis. It was observed that the mean of G5 (17,46 MPa) was significantly different from the other groups means, except for G1 (14,60 MPa). Statistically G12 (1,03) had the lowest bond strength differing from the other groups. Bondings between was ceramic and enamel determined the highest bond strength for all luting agents. Due to the low bond strength and the failures between cement and substrate, using the self-adhesive cement and laboratorial composite to make bonds is not advisable.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of three types of luting agents: self-etching (Panavia F, P), conventional (Rely X ARC, R) and self-adhesive (Rely X U100, U), using enamel (E) or dentin (D) as substrates and two types of restorative materials (ceramic, C and laboratorial composite, R). One hundred and twenty-five bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin leaving their bucal side exposed. The teeth were ground flat until a 5mm2 area was created. Half of the specimens had enamel exposed and the other half had dentin exposed. A piece of tape with a 3 mm hole was used to delimitate the bonding area. Sixty cylinders of ceramic (IPS E.max Press) and sixty of composite (SR Adoro), 3 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height, were confectioned. The cylinders were luted to the substrates, forming twelve groups: G1 (PEC); G2 (PER); G3 (PDC); G4 (PDR); G5 (REC), G6 (RER); G7 (RDC); G8(RDR): G9 (UEC); G10(UER); G11(UDC) and G12(UDR). After one week, the specimens were subjected to a shear test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0,5 mm/min. The results were submitted to both the Anova and Tukey tests (p<0.05) for statistical analysis. It was observed that the mean of G5 (17,46 MPa) was significantly different from the other groups means, except for G1 (14,60 MPa). Statistically G12 (1,03) had the lowest bond strength differing from the other groups. Bondings between was ceramic and enamel determined the highest bond strength for all luting agents. Due to the low bond strength and the failures between cement and substrate, using the self-adhesive cement and laboratorial composite to make bonds is not advisable.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Cimentos dentarios, Materiais dentários, Esmalte dentário, Resistência ao cisalhamento, Shear bond strength
Como citar
ARIKI, Eurípedes Kaizo. Resistência de união de cimentos resinosos, ao cisalhamento, variando o substrato e o material restaurador. 2009. 131 f. , 2009.