Biomechanics of the fresh and conserved bovine pericardium

dc.contributor.authorSoares, Laura Gusman [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Fabrício Singaretti [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, Andréa Barros Piazzon de Souza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Medeiros, Ana Carolina Souza Ramos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBariani Junior, Antônio Fernando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFechis, Alisson Diego Senna [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Thiago André Salvitti de Sá [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:23:46Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:23:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe use of biological membranes in surgeries is a reality for years, and one of the most used is the bovine pericardium, so the purpose of this research is to describe the bovine pericardium's biomechanics by comparing two directions of a test, one parallel to the longitudinal heart axis and one perpendicular. 20 adult bovine pericardium were tested for the maximum rupture force and rupture elongation, collecting four samples of each pericardium direction. In phase 2, eight pericardia were conserved for 4 months in a 98% glycerine solution, and the solution in which they were submerged was microbiologically analysed monthly. The Mann–Whitney test was used; there was a very significant difference between the perpendicular and parallel groups (p =.0001). The T test showed no significant difference for the rupture elongation (p =.0938). In pericardium preserved in glycerine, the outliers were removed regarding the maximum rupture force, and a Boxcox transformation was performed (λ = 0.25). Outliers were removed for the rupture elongation, and Bartlett's test (p =.7836), and Cramer–Von Mises (p =.5033) were performed and then, the analysis of variance (p <.0001), followed by the Tukey test at 5%. In the microbiological analysis, there was no presence of microorganisms during conservation. The research has shown that the pericardium collection direction influences its resistance and it can be stored in glycerine for 4 months without losing biomechanical characteristics.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Morphology and Physiology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Animal Morphology and Physiology São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ahe.12665
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Veterinary Medicine Series C: Anatomia Histologia Embryologia.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ahe.12665
dc.identifier.issn1439-0264
dc.identifier.issn0340-2096
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101272109
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/205930
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Veterinary Medicine Series C: Anatomia Histologia Embryologia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectanatomy
dc.subjectbiological membrane
dc.subjectglycerine
dc.subjectpericardium
dc.subjectreconstructive surgery
dc.titleBiomechanics of the fresh and conserved bovine pericardiumen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5732-9622[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0199-6105[3]

Arquivos

Coleções