Simple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration success

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorMassi, Klécia G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorChaves, Rafael B.
dc.contributor.authorTambosi, Leandro R.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionSecretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente
dc.contributor.institutionSociedade Brasileira de Restauração Ecológica
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:49:31Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:49:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-01
dc.description.abstractLegal regulation related to restoration monitoring should be supported and validated by studies that evaluate the performance of indicators. In Brazil, a specific state regulation uses three indicators to attest recovery: ground cover with native vegetation (i.e. canopy cover, for tropical forest restoration projects) and density and richness of native plants spontaneously regenerating. Thus, we adopted other three ecological parameters: richness of zoochorous regenerant species (a functioning indicator linked to seed dispersal), the density of non-pioneer regenerants (a composition indicator), and dominance (a structure indicator), to test whether the indicators of the legal state monitoring protocol were associated to these more qualified indicators and we discussed the state protocol effectiveness. We evaluated 10 sites under restoration in the Atlantic Forest ranging from 9 to 45 years old and a reference area. Our results showed that the three indicators of the state monitoring protocol were associated to more qualified indicators in different restored sites and they can be considered proxies of ecological parameters to monitor and attest restoration success of tropical rainforest. In addition, dominance was strongly associated with richness of regenerants, but it was not associated to density, implying that richness and density of regenerants are not redundant and both should be monitored in the field. This kind of analysis could be usefully applied to define powerful and integrative indicators elsewhere, simplifying them without losing effectiveness as a means to stimulate wide adoption of monitoring protocols in the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Engenharia Ambiental Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade de São Paulo, SP
dc.description.affiliationSecretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente, SP
dc.description.affiliationSociedade Brasileira de Restauração Ecológica, PR
dc.description.affiliationCentro de Engenharia Modelagem e Ciências Sociais Aplicadas Universidade Federal do ABC, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Engenharia Ambiental Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rec.13520
dc.identifier.citationRestoration Ecology, v. 30, n. 3, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/rec.13520
dc.identifier.issn1526-100X
dc.identifier.issn1061-2971
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122727455
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/223238
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRestoration Ecology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectecological restoration
dc.subjectindicators
dc.subjectmonitoring protocol
dc.subjectnatural regeneration
dc.subjectpassive restoration
dc.subjectpolicy
dc.subjecttropical forest
dc.titleSimple indicators are good proxies for ecological complexity when assessing Atlantic Forest restoration successen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1823-7965[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5486-7310[3]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos