Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorDias, Ana Giselle Aguiar [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMagno, Marcela Baraúna
dc.contributor.authorDelbem, Alberto Carlos Botazzo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCunha, Robson Frederico [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMaia, Lucianne Cople
dc.contributor.authorPessan, Juliano Pelim [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUNISL – Centro Universitário São Lucas
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Rio de Janeiro
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:19:30Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:19:30Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study compared the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement (GIC) compared to composite resin (CR) in Class II restorations in primary teeth. Data: Literature search according to PRISMA guidelines including randomized controlled trials comparing Class II restorations performed with GIC, compared to CR, in primary teeth. Sources: PubMeb, Scopus, Web of Science, VHL, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials and OpenGrey, regardless of date or language. Study: Ten studies were included in qualitative synthesis, and 9 in the meta-analyses (MA). Six studies were classified as low risk of bias, and 4 as “unclear”. Heterogeneity ranged from null to high (0% to 73%). GIC and CR presented similar failure patterns (risk difference −0.04 [−0.11, 0.03]; p = 0.25, I2 = 51%), and the exclusion of studies with follow-up period <24 months, or grouping according to the type of GIC (conventional or resin-modified), or according to the type of isolation (cotton roll or rubber dam), or according to the evaluation criteria applied did not affect the pattern of the results obtained. GIC exhibited significantly lower values of secondary carious lesions (SCL) than CR (SCL: risk difference 0.06 [0.02, 0.10], p = 0.008, I2 = 0%). The materials presented similar performance (p > 0.05) regarding the overall effect, as well as for marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation and anatomical form. The superiority of GIC was maintained when resin-modified GIC and rubber dam isolation were analyzed separately. Conclusions: GIC and CR presented similar clinical performance for all criteria analyzed, except for secondary carious lesions, in which GIC presented superior performance, especially for the resin-modified GIC and with rubber dam isolation.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry Araçatuba Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Public Health
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry UNISL – Centro Universitário São Lucas
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Rio de Janeiro Department of Pediatric Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry Araçatuba Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Public Health
dc.format.extent1-13
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.004
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, v. 73, p. 1-13.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.004
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85045324295.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85045324295
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/176180
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,919
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectComposite resin
dc.subjectGlass ionomer cement
dc.subjectPrimary teeth
dc.titleClinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeResenha
unesp.author.lattes0421571920582994[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8159-4853[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1026-9401[5]

Arquivos

Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85045324295.pdf
Tamanho:
3.82 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigos - Odontologia Infantil e Social - FOA