Sequential healing at implants with different configuration and modified surfaces: an experimental study in the dog

dc.contributor.authorSchweikert, Michael T.
dc.contributor.authorBotticelli, Daniele [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSbricoli, Luca
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorFavero, Vittorio
dc.contributor.authorSalata, Luiz A.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Medical Science
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionARDEC
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Padua
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T15:35:52Z
dc.date.available2015-12-07T15:35:52Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the peri-implant soft and hard tissue adaptation at implants with different modified surfaces and configurations. Six Beagle dogs were used. Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally. After 3 months, full-thickness flaps were elevated, and two different types of trans-mucosal implants (ICX-Gold®, Medentis Medical GmbH, Dernau, Germany and SLActive®, Institute Straumann, Bern, Switzerland) and two different surfaces were randomly installed in the distal regions of one side of the mandible. Abutments were applied, and a nonsubmerged healing was allowed. After 1 month, the procedures were performed in the other side of the mandible, and after a further month, the animals were sacrificed, biopsies were collected, and ground sections prepared for histological examination. Similar results in marginal bone and soft tissues dimensions were observed after 1 month of healing at the two implant systems used, and no major changes could be observed after 2 months of healing. After 1 month, the percentage of new bone was 69.0% and 68.8% at ICX-Gold and SLActive surfaces, respectively. After 2 months, the percentage of new bone was 67.8% and 71.9% at ICX-Gold Medentis and SLActive surfaces, respectively. No statistically significant differences in osseointegration were found. The two implant systems used resulted in similar osseointegration after 1 and 2 months of healing.en
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Dentistry, University of Medical Science, La Habana, Cuba
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba (FOA), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, SP, Brasil
dc.description.affiliationARDEC, Ariminum Odontologica, Rimini, Italy
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Dentistry, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto (FORP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba (FOA), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Araçatuba, SP, Brasil
dc.format.extent1-10
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12330
dc.identifier.citationClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2015.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cid.12330
dc.identifier.issn1708-8208
dc.identifier.pubmed26265196
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/131459
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectSlactiveen
dc.subjectAnimal studyen
dc.subjectBoneen
dc.subjectBone healingen
dc.subjectEarly healingen
dc.subjectHistologyen
dc.subjectImplant dentistryen
dc.subjectImplant surfaceen
dc.subjectNonsubmerged healingen
dc.subjectOsseointegrationen
dc.titleSequential healing at implants with different configuration and modified surfaces: an experimental study in the dogen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderWiley Periodicals, Inc.

Arquivos

Coleções