Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho, Carlos Dellavechia
dc.contributor.authorKalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMilioni, Fabio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLoures, João Paulo
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Vitor Siqueira
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Adelino Sanchez Ramos
dc.contributor.authorPapoti, Marcelo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:03:25Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:03:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-01
dc.description.abstractCarvalho CD, Kalva-Filho CA, Milioni F, Loures JP, Serrano VS, Silva ASR, Papoti M. Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models. JEPonline 2020;23(4):15-24. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of undulating (UL) and constant load (CL) training models applied in Swiss mice. Twenty male mice were divided into 3 groups: (a) Control Group [CON; n=6]; (b) Undulating Group [ULG; n=7]; and (c) Constant Load Group [CLG; n=7]. Both training periods lasted 8 wks, 5 d∙wk-1, as prescribed in accordance with maximal speed reached during the incremental test (MaxS). The ULG trained through sessions classified as Endurance 1 (60 min at 40% MaxS), Endurance 2 (30 min at 60% MaxS), Endurance 3 (4 x 5 min at 100% MaxS), and Anaerobic (10 x 1 min at 120% MaxS). All sessions for CLG consisted of a 60-min duration at 60% of MaxS. Both training models induced positive adaptations until the 4th wk of training. However, these adaptations were not maintained during the last 4 wks, declining MaxS in relation to baseline. The CLG was able to accomplish only 69% of proposed training volume. However, the ULG was able to accomplish 94% of the proposed volume. Comparing the reasons for sessions failure, CLG presented higher number of dropouts related to unsatisfactory running (P-value = 0.008) and exhaustion (P-value = 0.001), while the ULG quit the sessions mainly due to injuries (P-value = 0.003). These results demonstrate that independently of the training model used, positive adaptations were induced up to the 4th-wk of training with high intensity sessions producing the larger amount of dropouts due primarily to injuries.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationPhysical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance Ribeirão Preto Medical School University of São Paulo (USP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespPhysical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: FAPESP/n◦2014/19627-6
dc.format.extent15-24
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Exercise Physiology Online, v. 23, n. 4, p. 15-24, 2020.
dc.identifier.issn1097-9751
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104089288
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/207930
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Exercise Physiology Online
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAerobic Training
dc.subjectMaximal Speed
dc.subjectMice
dc.subjectRunning
dc.titlePeriodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Modelsen
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Clínica Médica - FMB