Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets versus delayed implants into healed sockets: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorMello, C. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLemos, C. A.A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVerri, F. R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, D. M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, M. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, E. P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:11:38Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:11:38Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survival rate of the implants and the peri-implant tissue changes associated with implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets and those inserted in healed sockets. This review has been registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42016043309. A systematic search was conducted by two reviewers independently in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library using different search terms; articles published until November 2016 were searched for. The searches identified 30 eligible studies. A total of 3,049 implants were installed in a total of 1,435 patients with a mean age of 46.68 years and a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. The survival rate of delayed implants (98.38%) was significantly greater than immediate implants (95.21%) (p =.001). For the marginal bone loss (p =.32), implant stability quotients values (p =.44), and pocket probing depth (p =.94) there was no significant difference between the analysed groups. The immediate implants placed in fresh sockets should be performed with caution because of the significantly lower survival rates than delayed implants inserted in healed sockets.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent1162-1177
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.016
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 46, n. 9, p. 1162-1177, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.016
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85018948716.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020
dc.identifier.issn0901-5027
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85018948716
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174543
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,137
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectfresh socket
dc.subjecthealed socket
dc.subjectimmediate implant
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.titleImmediate implant placement into fresh extraction sockets versus delayed implants into healed sockets: A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeResenha

Arquivos

Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85018948716.pdf
Tamanho:
3.23 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigos - Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOA