Effectiveness of functional training on cardiorespiratory parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorRezende Barbosa, Marianne Penachini da Costa de
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Vinicius Cunha
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Anne Kastelianne França da [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Riera, Andrés Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorVanderlei, Luiz Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionFaculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:13:40Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:13:40Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Functional training is a new training vision that was prepared from the gesture imitation of daily activities. Although your use has become popular in clinical practice, the influence of the several cardiorespiratory adjustments performed during the functional training in different populations and conditions is unknown. So, the aim of this systematic review was to gather information in the literature regarding the influence of functional training on cardiorespiratory parameters. Methods: We conducted search strategies on MEDLINE, PEDro, EMBASE, SportDiscus and Cochrane to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of functional training on cardiorespiratory parameters. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summarized the evidence. Results: Five original studies were included. Effects favoured functional training on oxygen consumption (VO2) at intermediate-term follow-up: weighted mean difference −1·0 (95% CI: 5·4–3·3), P = 0·642, and a small and not clinically important effect observed on VO2 favouring control at intermediate-term follow-up (i.e. mean difference of 1·30 (95% CI 1·07–1·53), P<0·001). Conclusion: According to the GRADE system, there is very low quality evidence that functional training is better than other interventions to improve cardiovascular parameters. This result encourages new searches about the theme.en
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina do ABC (FMABC)
dc.description.affiliationFisioterapia Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Fisioterapia Universidade Estadual Paulista - FCT/UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Fisioterapia Universidade Estadual Paulista - FCT/UNESP
dc.format.extent539-546
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12445
dc.identifier.citationClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, v. 38, n. 4, p. 539-546, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cpf.12445
dc.identifier.issn1475-097X
dc.identifier.issn1475-0961
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85026367965
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174968
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,876
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectblood pressure
dc.subjectexercise therapy
dc.subjectheart rate
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectoximetry
dc.subjectoxygen consumption
dc.subjectrespiratory rate
dc.titleEffectiveness of functional training on cardiorespiratory parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsen
dc.typeResenha
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2468-3953[1]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Fisioterapia - FCT