Conclusion

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorPrevost, Gary
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Carlos Oliva
dc.contributor.authorAyerbe, Luis Fernando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVanden, Harry E.
dc.contributor.institutionCollege of Saint Benedict
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Havana
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionHarvard University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Barcelona
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of South Florida
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:31:42Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:31:42Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe security policy of the United States in the whole of the Western Hemisphere must be placed in its broad historic perspective with attention to the current moment of the twenty-first century. For two centuries, back to the time of Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe, leaders in Washington, DC, have viewed the hemisphere as the natural sphere of influence for the United States, a place of great economic interest for the United States in terms of investment, raw materials, and markets. That reality has not changed over two centuries, only changes over time have been in the ability of the United States to extend its dominance in the region. The part of the region closest to the United States-Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean-came under US control in the first 30 years of the twentieth century and remain there in the twenty-first century. That control remains primarily through regional trade agreements and the newly launched security initiatives. The United States’ influence in South America has always been more fluid and it remains so in the early twenty-first century. The United States has always sought a dominant role in South America due to its vast resources and markets. In the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth century, the United States extended some measure of economic influence throughout South America but the reality of British and French political and economic power thwarted US domination.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Political Science St. John’s University College of Saint Benedict
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Havana
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Economics State University of Sao Paulo (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDavid Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies Harvard University
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Barcelona
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of South Florida
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Economics State University of Sao Paulo (UNESP)
dc.format.extent187-188
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137379528_10
dc.identifier.citationUS National Security Concerns in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Concept of Ungoverned Spaces and Failed States, p. 187-188.
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/9781137379528_10
dc.identifier.lattes7138436147757988
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85014680876
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/178698
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofUS National Security Concerns in Latin America and the Caribbean: The Concept of Ungoverned Spaces and Failed States
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleConclusionen
dc.typeCapítulo de livro
unesp.author.lattes7138436147757988

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Economia - FCLAR