Straight and Offset Implant Placement under Axial and Nonaxial Loads in Implant-Supported Prostheses: Strain Gauge Analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorAbreu, Celina Wanderley
dc.contributor.authorNishioka, Renato Sussumu [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBalducci, Ivan [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorConsani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:28Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:28Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to quantify strain development during axial and nonaxial loading using strain gauge analysis for three-element implant-supported FPDs, varying the arrangement of implants: straight line (L) and offset (O). Materials and Methods: Three Morse taper implants arranged in a straight line and three implants arranged in an offset configuration were inserted into two polyurethane blocks. Microunit abutments were screwed onto the implants, applying a 20 Ncm torque. Plastic copings were screwed onto the abutments, which received standard wax patterns cast in Co-Cr alloy (n = 10). Four strain gauges were bonded onto the surface of each block tangential to the implants. The occlusal screws of the superstructure were tightened onto microunit abutments using 10 Ncm and then axial and nonaxial loading of 30 Kg was applied for 10 seconds on the center of each implant and at 1 and 2 mm from the implants, totaling nine load application points. The microdeformations determined at the nine points were recorded by four strain gauges, and the same procedure was performed for all of the frameworks. Three loadings were made per load application point. The magnitude of microstrain on each strain gauge was recorded in units of microstrain (mu). The data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results: The configuration factor was statistically significant (p= 0.0004), but the load factor (p= 0.2420) and the interaction between the two factors were not significant (p= 0.5494). Tukey's test revealed differences between axial offset (mu) (183.2 +/- 93.64) and axial straight line (285.3 +/- 61.04) and differences between nonaxial 1 mm offset (201.0 +/- 50.24) and nonaxial 1 mm straight line (315.8 +/- 59.28). Conclusion: There was evidence that offset placement is capable of reducing the strain around an implant. In addition, the type of loading, axial force or nonaxial, did not have an influence until 2 mm.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Periodontol, Piracicaba, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Social Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Social Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Alagoas (FAPEAL)
dc.format.extent535-539
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00871.x
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. Hoboken: Wiley-blackwell, v. 21, n. 7, p. 535-539, 2012.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00871.x
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.lattes0056660842284397
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1458-601X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22972
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000310803300005
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.745
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectStrain gaugeen
dc.subjectMorse taper implanten
dc.subjectaxial loaden
dc.titleStraight and Offset Implant Placement under Axial and Nonaxial Loads in Implant-Supported Prostheses: Strain Gauge Analysisen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dcterms.rightsHolderWiley-blackwell
unesp.author.lattes0056660842284397[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1458-601X[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:

Coleções

Artigos - Odontologia Social e Clínica Infantil - ICT