In Vitro Assessment of the Abrasion Resistance of Two Types of Artificial Teeth Submitted to Brushing

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorPolicastro, Vivian Barnabé [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGiro, Gabriela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMendoza-Marin, Danny Omar [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPaleari, André Gustavo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCompagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:14:17Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:14:17Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the effect of brushing with different solutions on the abrasion resistance of two types of acrylic resin teeth. Materials and Methods: Maxillary premolars from two types of acrylic teeth (Biotone and Biotone IPN) were divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the solution used during brushing: distilled water (control), coconut soap, or dentifrice. A mechanical brushing machine was used to simulate approximately 1 year of brushing (11,000 strokes). The weight loss (WL) of teeth was obtained from the difference between the initial (IW) and final weight (FW) of each specimen, and the mean of percentage of weight loss (PWL) was calculated for each group. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Bonferroni's post-test comparison (α = 0.05). Results: A statistically significant difference was found for the factor solution (p < 0.001). Brushing using dentifrice caused the highest values of weight loss (–0.50%), in comparison with the groups brushed with coconut soap (0.00%) or distilled water (0.00%). Conclusions: For both types of artificial teeth, brushing with dentifrice produced higher abrasion than brushing with coconut soap or water.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent485-488
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12455
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics, v. 25, n. 6, p. 485-488, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.12455
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.lattes8921196002764597
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85028236513
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/175082
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectartificial teeth
dc.subjectComplete denture
dc.subjecttooth abrasion
dc.subjecttoothbrushing
dc.titleIn Vitro Assessment of the Abrasion Resistance of Two Types of Artificial Teeth Submitted to Brushingen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.lattes2999722781960616[7]
unesp.author.lattes8921196002764597
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0203-2386[7]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOAR