Logo do repositório
 

Would nesotriatoma bruneri usinger, 1944 be a valid species?

dc.contributor.authorAlevi, Kaio C.C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorReis, Yago V. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Ana L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorImperador, Carlos H.L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBanho, Cecília A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Felipe F.F.
dc.contributor.authorAzeredo-Oliveira, Maria T.V. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:02:26Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:02:26Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-14
dc.description.abstractVariation in the size and morphological differences intraspecific of Nesotriatoma flavida led to the description of N. bruneri. However, two years later the same author proposed the synonymization N. bruneri with N. flavida. N. bruneri was revalidated through morphological analysis after 35 years. Thus, given the existing taxonomic questioning between these Cuban triatomines, we analyzed new parameters such as genetic distance from the mitochondrial 16S rDNA deposited in Genbank and cytogenetic characterization, through the constitutive heterochromatin pattern, in order to reassess the specific status of N. bruneri. The analysis of the disposition of constitutive heterochromatin in the genome of these triatomines allowed observing that only the sex chromosome Y is heterochromatic, and the autosomes and the sex chromosomes X are euchromatic. These characteristics are identical to those described for N. flavida. By means of analysis of genetic distance matrix, we found that the genetic distance between N. bruneri and N. flavida was only 0.04%. Thus, by means of extremely low genetic distance and identical cytogenetic characteristics, we suggest that N. bruneri should be back again synonymized with N. flavida. However, we recommend that experimental hybrid crosses and new molecular analysis should be conducted, focusing mainly in the genetic distance based on other genes, on the rate of fertility of eggs and viability of hybrids to confirm the proposed of synonymization.en
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Biologia Celular Instituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista Jûlio de Mesquita Filho (IBILCE/UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório Nacional e Internacional de Referência em Taxonomia de Triatomíneos Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
dc.description.affiliationUnespLaboratório de Biologia Celular Instituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista Jûlio de Mesquita Filho (IBILCE/UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.format.extent396-400
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4103.4.8
dc.identifier.citationZootaxa, v. 4103, n. 4, p. 396-400, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.11646/zootaxa.4103.4.8
dc.identifier.issn1175-5334
dc.identifier.issn1175-5326
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84963983798
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/172853
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofZootaxa
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,259
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCytogenetics
dc.subjectFlavida complex
dc.subjectSynonymy
dc.titleWould nesotriatoma bruneri usinger, 1944 be a valid species?en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas, São José do Rio Pretopt
unesp.departmentBiologia - IBILCEpt

Arquivos