Logotipo do repositório

Evaluation of Peri‐Implant Bone Repair of Commercially Pure Titanium or Titanium‐Aluminum‐Vanadium Alloy Implants With or Without Laser‐Modified Surface

dc.contributor.authorde Jesus, Laís Kawamata [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHadad, Henrique [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Luis Fernando Alves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Rodrigues, Letícia Gabriella [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Ana Flávia Piquera [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, Thallita Pereira
dc.contributor.authorPiazza, Rodolfo Debone [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGuastaldi, Fernando Pozzi Semeghini
dc.contributor.authorPoli, Pier Paolo
dc.contributor.authorMaiorana, Carlo
dc.contributor.authorGuastaldi, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Roberta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Francisley Ávila [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T14:50:12Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-05
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the peri-implant bone repair of implants manufactured from commercially pure titanium (cp-Ti) or titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy (Ti-6Al-4 V) with machined (MS) or laser-modified (LS) surfaces. Implants (n = 192) were installed in the tibias of 96 rats and divided according to the implant installed: (1) cpMS: cp-Ti with an MS surface, (2) cpLS: cp-Ti with an LS surface, (3) alloyMS: Ti-6Al-4 V with an MS surface, and (4) alloyLS: Ti-6Al-4 V with an LS surface. Scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX) analysis was performed prior to implant placement. At 14, 21, and 42 days, biomechanical analysis, SEM-EDX of the removed implants, and measurement of the percentage of bone-implant contact (%BIC) and neoformed bone area (%NBA) were performed. At 42 days, the mineral apposition rate (MAR) and bone dynamics were analyzed. At 14 and 21 days, the alloyLS group showed higher removal torque values than cpLS (p < 0.05). For SEM-EDX, the cpLS and alloyLS groups showed surfaces covered by bone tissue and higher peaks of calcium and phosphorus. No statistical differences were observed for %BIC, and at 14 days, a higher %NBA was found for alloyLS than cpLS (p < 0.05). At 42 days, in bone dynamics, alloyLS showed a higher amount of calcein compared to cpLS (p < 0.05), and higher MAR values were observed for cpLS (p < 0.05). The alloyLS group promoted accelerated peri-implant bone repair at 14 and 21 days. However, at 42 days, cpLS surpassed the values of removal torque, %BIC, %NBA, bone dynamics, and MAR.
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Health Science, University of Araraquara (UNIARA), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Inorganic, Institute of Chemistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Implant Center for Edentulism and Jawbone Atrophies, Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cá Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Inorganic, Institute of Chemistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Basic Sciences, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1190529999
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1190529999
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jbm.b.35610
dc.identifier.issn1552-4973
dc.identifier.issn1552-4981
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0459-5860
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6446-3643
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5761-5554
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7562-772X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2464-8181
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5837-0851
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8554-8849
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3739-1490
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8748-9483
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6433-3555
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6773-6966
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1427-071X
dc.identifier.pmid40616448
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/322051
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials; n. 7; v. 113; p. e35610
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsoa_all
dc.rights.sourceRightsbronze
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleEvaluation of Peri‐Implant Bone Repair of Commercially Pure Titanium or Titanium‐Aluminum‐Vanadium Alloy Implants With or Without Laser‐Modified Surface
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationbc74a1ce-4c4c-4dad-8378-83962d76c4fd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybc74a1ce-4c4c-4dad-8378-83962d76c4fd
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Química, Araraquarapt

Arquivos