Logo do repositório

Economic viability of Integrated Agricultural Production Systems With consortiums in the pasture phase in Mato Grosso, Brazil

dc.contributor.authorSouza, Sandra Maria Monteiro de Araujo
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Aguinaldo Rocha
dc.contributor.authorSabbag, Omar Jorge [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, Leandro Pereira
dc.contributor.authorWruck, Flavio de Jesus
dc.contributor.authorWingert, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorMacedo, Luis Otavio Bau
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Laercio Santos
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Edicarlos Damacena de
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Fed Rondonopolis UFR
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:05:09Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe particularities of Integrated Agricultural Production Systems (IAPS) influence the costs of implementation and the profitability of production. However, there are few scientific approaches that seek to elucidate the total cost of SIPA in order to help make decisions about the most appropriate method to install. The purpose of this study was to propose the application of a costing method suitable for SIPA for an integrated assessment of the economic and financial viability of SIPA with single and intercropped pastures under no-till farming in Mato Grosso. Between 2015 and 2017, four types of SIPA in the pasture phase were evaluated for economic viability. Based on the cash flow, the economic viability indicators were calculated: Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit/Cost Ratio (BCI) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The absorption costing method allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the production costs of the SIPA, and through the apportionment criterion, indirect costs were integrated into all production activities. SIPA has different levels of profitability, depending on the grass and the consortium used. The overall net results in the 15/16 and 16/17 harvests ranged from R$ 701.81 to 1,889.01 in single pastures and from 1,435.86 to 2,129.39 in intercropped pastures. The systems showed the capacity to remunerate investments, especially when using Piata grass or a consortium between grasses and legumes with better economic indicators.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Parana UFPR, Rua 15 Novembro 1299, BR-80060000 Curitiba, PR, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Rondonopolis UFR, Av Estudantes 5055,Cidade Univ, BR-78736900 Rondonopolis, MT, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista Unesp, Av Brasil Ctr 56, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Arroze & Feijao, Km 12,GO-462, BR-75375000 Santo Antonio De Goias, GO, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista Unesp, Av Brasil Ctr 56, BR-15385000 Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent2-31
dc.identifier.citationCustos E Agronegocio On Line. Bairro De Dois Irmaos: Univ Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao, v. 19, n. 1, p. 2-31, 2023.
dc.identifier.issn1808-2882
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/296951
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001103424800014
dc.language.isopor
dc.publisherUniv Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao
dc.relation.ispartofCustos E Agronegocio On Line
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCerrado, Agricultural Credit. SIPA
dc.titleEconomic viability of Integrated Agricultural Production Systems With consortiums in the pasture phase in Mato Grosso, Brazilen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderUniv Fed Rural Pernambuco, Dept Administracao
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication85b724f4-c5d4-4984-9caf-8f0f0d076a19
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery85b724f4-c5d4-4984-9caf-8f0f0d076a19
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia, Ilha Solteirapt

Arquivos