A tradição discursiva argumentaiva: uma abordagem dos mecanismos juntivos via heterogeneidade da escrita
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2018-01-27
Autores
Rodrigues, Adalbeto Mesaque
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
Neste trabalho, vinculado ao GPEL (Grupo de Pesquisas sobre a Linguagem-CNPq), que se liga a um projeto maior, “Aspectos sintomáticos da junção na delimitação de Tradições Discursivas”, propõe-se um tratamento dos processos de junção na tradição discursiva (TD) argumentativa, via heterogeneidade da escrita, por meio de um modelo funcionalista, para a descrição e análise das relações sintático-semânticas. Assentada na hipótese de Kabatek (2005a) de que os Mecanismos de junção (MJ) são elementos sintomáticos, capazes de caracterizar e delimitar uma TD, a proposta de trabalho investigativo do funcionamento dos MJ visa à sistematização das regularidades e à compreensão dos usos, em relação ao que será considerado tradicional, no âmbito textual. Também se vincula à tese de Corrêa (1997) sobre a heterogeneidade constitutiva da escrita, que permite uma análise fundamentada na imbricação dos modos oral/falado e letrado/escrito, por meio dos eixos de circulação dos escreventes. Dessa forma, assim como em trabalhos de Longhin (2011a/b), Lopes-Damasio (2011, 2014) e Tuão-Brito (2014), atrela-se o conceito de língua à concepção coseariana (1979), que fundamenta a abordagem metodológica das TD e percebe os enunciados, historicamente determinados, como controlados por regras idiomáticas e discursivas, e adota-se a seguinte pergunta de pesquisa: Qual o funcionamento sintático-semântico dos MJ em TD argumentativas produzidas por alunos do 6º e 9º anos do Ensino Fundamental? A partir dessa pergunta, objetiva-se: (i) descrever e analisar os MJ, em textos pertencentes à TD argumentativa, no modo escrito de enunciação, a partir das relações semânticas e da interdependência existente entre as porções componentes da oração complexa, na perspectiva de Halliday (1985) e Raible (2001, 1992, apud KABATEK, 2005a/b); (ii) relacionar o uso e funcionamento dos MJ às características da TD argumentação; e (iii) analisar e buscar indícios do papel do uso da escrita no contexto da TD investigada, a partir da observação do comportamento da junção mediante traços da relação oral/falado e letrado/escrito em consonância com a heterogeneidade da escrita. Nessa direção, constatou-se que: (a) no âmbito sintático, há uma prevalência da arquitetura paratática sobre a hipotática, (b) no semântico, as relações de adição, causalidade e contraste são mais frequentes, (c) no âmbito textual, há uma mescla constitutiva da TD argumentativa com as TD listagem, injuntiva, expositiva, narrativa e pergunta/ resposta e (d) no âmbito das práticas de linguagem, encontram-se indícios que configuram a imbricação entre oral/falado e letrado/escrito nos textos escritos de ambos os segmentos. Os resultados, sedimentados em uma descrição analítica da materialidade linguística que, concomitantemente, vincula-se a aspectos pragmático-discursivos, apontam para uma escrita que se delineia gradualmente e que depende de fatores semântico-cognitivos, idiomáticos, históricos e de vivência das culturas oral e letrada no cotidiano.
In this work, linked to the RGOL (Research Group on Language-NRC), which is linked to a larger project, "Symptomatic aspects of the junction in the delimitation of Discursive Traditions", it is proposed a treatment of the processes of junction in the discursive tradition (DT), through the heterogeneity of writing, through a functionalist model, for the description and analysis of tactical-semantic relations. Based on the hypothesis of Kabatek (2005a) that the Junction Mechanisms (JM) are symptomatic elements capable of characterizing and delimiting a DT, the proposed research work on the functioning of the JM aims at systematizing regularities and understanding the uses, in relation to what will be considered traditional, in the textual scope. It is also linked to Corrêa's (1997) thesis on the constitutive heterogeneity of writing, which allows an analysis based on the imbrication of oral/spoken and literate/ written modes, through makers circulation axes. Thus, as in the works of Longhin (2011a / b), Lopes-Damasio (2011, 2014) and Tuão-Brito (2014), the concept of language is linked to the Cosearian conception (1979), which underlies the methodological approach of the DT and perceives the statements, historically determined, as controlled by idiomatic and discursive rules, and it adopts the following research question: What is the tactical-semantic functioning of the JM in argumentative DT produced by students of the 6th and 9th grade of Elementary Education? From this question, this work aims to: (i) describe and analyze the JM, in texts belonging to the argumentative TD, in the written mode of enunciation, from the semantic relations and interdependence existing between the component portions of the complex sentence, from the perspective (ii) to relate the use and functioning of the MJ to the characteristics of DT argumentation; and (iii) analyze and seek indications of the role of writing use in the context of the investigated DT, from the observation of the behavior of the joint by traces of the oral/ spoken and literated/written relationship in accordance with the writing heterogeneity. In this sense, it was found that: (a) in the syntactic context, there is a prevalence of the parattic architecture over the hypothetical, (b) in the semantic, the relations of addition, causality and contrast are more frequent; a constitutive mixture of the argumentative DT with listing, injunction, narrative and question/ answer DT and (d) in the scope of the language practices, there are clues that configure the overlap between oral/ spoken and literated/written in the written texts of both segments. The results, sedimented in an analytical description of linguistic materiality, concomitantly, is related to pragmatic-discursive aspects, point to a writing that is gradually delineated and that depends on semantic-cognitive, idiomatic, historical and oral and literate cultures in everyday life.
In this work, linked to the RGOL (Research Group on Language-NRC), which is linked to a larger project, "Symptomatic aspects of the junction in the delimitation of Discursive Traditions", it is proposed a treatment of the processes of junction in the discursive tradition (DT), through the heterogeneity of writing, through a functionalist model, for the description and analysis of tactical-semantic relations. Based on the hypothesis of Kabatek (2005a) that the Junction Mechanisms (JM) are symptomatic elements capable of characterizing and delimiting a DT, the proposed research work on the functioning of the JM aims at systematizing regularities and understanding the uses, in relation to what will be considered traditional, in the textual scope. It is also linked to Corrêa's (1997) thesis on the constitutive heterogeneity of writing, which allows an analysis based on the imbrication of oral/spoken and literate/ written modes, through makers circulation axes. Thus, as in the works of Longhin (2011a / b), Lopes-Damasio (2011, 2014) and Tuão-Brito (2014), the concept of language is linked to the Cosearian conception (1979), which underlies the methodological approach of the DT and perceives the statements, historically determined, as controlled by idiomatic and discursive rules, and it adopts the following research question: What is the tactical-semantic functioning of the JM in argumentative DT produced by students of the 6th and 9th grade of Elementary Education? From this question, this work aims to: (i) describe and analyze the JM, in texts belonging to the argumentative TD, in the written mode of enunciation, from the semantic relations and interdependence existing between the component portions of the complex sentence, from the perspective (ii) to relate the use and functioning of the MJ to the characteristics of DT argumentation; and (iii) analyze and seek indications of the role of writing use in the context of the investigated DT, from the observation of the behavior of the joint by traces of the oral/ spoken and literated/written relationship in accordance with the writing heterogeneity. In this sense, it was found that: (a) in the syntactic context, there is a prevalence of the parattic architecture over the hypothetical, (b) in the semantic, the relations of addition, causality and contrast are more frequent; a constitutive mixture of the argumentative DT with listing, injunction, narrative and question/ answer DT and (d) in the scope of the language practices, there are clues that configure the overlap between oral/ spoken and literated/written in the written texts of both segments. The results, sedimented in an analytical description of linguistic materiality, concomitantly, is related to pragmatic-discursive aspects, point to a writing that is gradually delineated and that depends on semantic-cognitive, idiomatic, historical and oral and literate cultures in everyday life.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Tradição discursiva argumentativa, Mecanismos de junção, Heterogeneidade da escrita, Argumentative discursive tradition., Mechanisms of junction., Heterogeneity of writing.