Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeocádio, Amanda de Carvalho Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Matusalém
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio, Élcio [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:57:46Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:57:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13746
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research.
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/207591
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To assess the influence of two different implant surfaces on osseointegration in maxillary sinuses of rabbits previously grafted with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) associated or not with fresh bone marrow (BM). Material and methods: Sixteen New Zealand albino rabbits (males, 3.5/4.5 kg and 9–12 months old) were randomly divided into two groups with 8 rabbits each, according to the type of association of biomaterials used to fill the animals’ maxillary sinuses: DBB (Deproteinized Bovine Bone) and DBB/BM (Deproteinized bovine bone associated with fresh autologous bone marrow). Ninety (90) days following the grafting procedure, the animals received implants in the area with two different microstructures (SA-Sandblasting + acid attack and SA-H-Sandblasting + acid attack + immersion in 0.9% sodium chloride isotonic solution). All rabbits were euthanized 90 days after implant placement. The microtomographic analysis was performed to verify the number of mineralized tissues around the implants throughout their length (%BV/TV), while the histomorphometric analysis was performed to verify the percentage of bone-implant contact around the implants throughout their length (%BIC). Results: We observed no differences in the quantity for %BV/TV (DBB-SA:33.25 ± 19.67; DBB-SA-H:35.15 ± 22.17; DBB/BM-SA:39.71 ± 24.21; DBB/BM-SA-H:36.40 ± 23.07) and %BIC (DBB-SA:58.94 ± 24.37; DBB-SA-H:52.52 ± 24.36; DBB/BM-SA: 61.66 ± 14.60; DBB/BM-SA-H: 64.06 ± 23.30) between the groups assessed. Conclusions: The addition of BM and the type of surface did not influence the osseointegration of implants installed in areas grafted with sintered deproteinized bovine bone at high temperatures in the late period assessed.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectanimal experiments
dc.subjectbiomaterials
dc.subjectbone substitutes
dc.subjectgrowth factors
dc.subjectsinus floor elevation
dc.titleOsseointegration of different implant surfaces in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone associated or not with fresh bone marrow—Preclinical study in rabbitsen
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto Latino-americano de pesquisa odontológica (ILAPEO)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry at Araraquara Univ Est Paulista/UNESP
dc.description.affiliationPost Graduation Course in Implantology Instituto Latino-americano de pesquisa odontológica (ILAPEO)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology School of Dentistry at Uberlândia Federal University of Uberlândia
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry at Araraquara Univ Est Paulista/UNESP
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.13746
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104042615
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1588-5932[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8778-0115[3]
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record