Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, APG
dc.contributor.authorSerra, Mônica da Costa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPaulillo, LAMS
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, A. L.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:23:35Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:23:35Z
dc.date.issued1999-06-01
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/qi/abstract.php?article_id=5348#.UulTf7RTvIU
dc.identifier.citationQuintessence International. Carol Stream: Quintessence Publ Co Inc., v. 30, n. 6, p. 427-431, 1999.
dc.identifier.issn0033-6572
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/34347
dc.description.abstractObjective: the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of various surface treatments for resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials by determining dye uptake spectrophotometrically. Method and materials: Two hundred twenty-four specimens, 4.1 mm in diameter and 2.0 mm thick, were made of 3 materials: Vitremer, Fuji II LC, and Photac-Fil Aplicap. Specimens were divided into 15 groups. The positive and negative control specimens remained unprotected, while the experimental specimens were protected with Heliobond light-activated bonding resin, Colorama nail varnish, or surface coatings indicated by the manufacturers of the glass-ionomer materials. Finishing Gloss for Vitremer, Fuji Varnish for Fuji II LC, and Ketac Glaze for Photac-Fil. The disks were immersed in 0.05% methylene blue for 24 hours except for the negative control group, which was immersed in deionized water. After 24 hours, the disks were removed, washed, and individually placed in 1 mL of 65% nitric acid for 24 hours. The solutions were centrifuged and the spectrophotometric absorbance was determined at 606 nm. The dye uptake was expressed in micrograms of dye per milliliter, and the results were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: There were no differences in dye uptake among the 3 resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials, however, all of them required surface protection. Conclusion: the best surface protection for the 3 evaluated materials was obtained with Heliobond light-activated bonding resin.en
dc.format.extent427-431
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relation.ispartofQuintessence International
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdehydrationpt
dc.subjecthybrid materialpt
dc.subjecthydrationpt
dc.subjectresin-modified glass-ionomer materialpt
dc.subjectsurface protectionpt
dc.titleEffectiveness of surface protection for resin-modified glass-ionomer materialsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.quintpub.com/terms.php
dcterms.rightsHolderQuintessence Publ Co Inc
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationUNICAMP, Piracicaba Sch Dent, BR-13414018 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationState Univ São Paulo, Araraquara Sch Dent, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespState Univ São Paulo, Araraquara Sch Dent, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000081253800009
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
dc.identifier.lattes1870516862560135
unesp.author.lattes1870516862560135
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1370-4122[4]
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.088
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,563
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record