Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Ronaldo S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFernandes e Oliveira, Hiskell Francine [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorCapalbo da Silva, Rodrigo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVerri, Fellippo R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
dc.contributor.institutionThe University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE)
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T13:47:05Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T13:47:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the tendency of movement, stress distribution, and microstrain of single-unit crowns in simulated cortical and trabecular bone, implants, and prosthetic components of narrow-diameter implants with different lengths placed at the crestal and subcrestal levels in the maxillary anterior region using 3D finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and methods: Six 3D models were simulated using Invesalius 3.0, Rhinoceros 4.0, and SolidWorks software. Each model simulated the right anterior maxillary region including a Morse taper implant of Ø2.9 mm with different lengths (7, 10, and 13 mm) placed at the crestal and subcrestal level and supporting a cement-retained monolithic single crown in the area of tooth 12. The FEA was performed using ANSYS 19.2. The simulated applied force was 178 N at 0°, 30°, and 60°. The results were analyzed using maps of displacement, von Mises (vM) stress, maximum principal stress, and microstrain. Results: Models with implants at the subcrestal level showed greater displacement. vM stress increased in the implant and prosthetic components when implants were placed at the subcrestal level compared with the crestal level; the length of the implants had a low influence on the stress distribution. Higher stress and strain concentrations were observed in the cortical bone of the subcrestal placement, independent of implant length. Non-axial loading influenced the increased stress and strain in all the evaluated structures. Conclusions: Narrow-diameter implants positioned at the crestal level showed a more favorable biomechanical behavior for simulated cortical bone, implants, and prosthetic components. Implant length had a smaller influence on stress or strain distribution than the other variables.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School (UNESP) Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry (Division of Prosthodontics) Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Campus Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationDepartment Prosthodontics Presidente Prudente Dental School The University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School (UNESP) Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13667
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthodontics.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13667
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150637413
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/248550
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectdental prosthesis
dc.subjectfinite element analysis
dc.titleBiomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysisen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2433-8167[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8273-489X[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0246-8101[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0245-0104[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5688-1669[6]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOA