Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis

dc.contributor.authorDel'Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorArioli-Filho, Joao Neudenir [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCompagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMollo Junior, Francisco de Assis [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:46:39Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:46:39Z
dc.date.issued2008-03-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the dimensional accuracy of a stone index and of 3 impression techniques (tapered impression copings, squared impression copings, and squared impression copings splinted with acrylic resin) associated with 3 pouring techniques (conventional, pouring using latex tubes fitted onto analogs, and pouring after joining the analogs with acrylic resin) for implant-supported prostheses. Materials and Methods: A mandibular brass cast with 4 stainless steel implant-abutment analogs, a framework, and 2 aluminum custom trays were fabricated. Polyether impression material was used for all impressions. Ten groups were formed (a control group and 9 test groups formed by combining each pouring technique and impression technique). Five casts were made per group for a total of 50 casts and 200 gap values (1 gap value for each implant-abutment analog). Results: The mean gap value with the index technique was 27.07 mu m. With the conventional pouring technique, the mean gap values were 116.97 mu m for the tapered group, 5784 mu m for the squared group, and 73.17 mu m for the squared splinted group. With pouring using latex tubes, the mean gap values were 65.69 mu m for the tapered group, 38.03 mu m for the squared group, and 82.47 mu m for the squared splinted group. With pouring after joining the analogs with acrylic resin, the mean gap values were 141.12 jum for the tapered group, 74.19 mu m for the squared group, and 104.67 mu m for the squared splinted group. No significant difference was detected among Index, squarellatex techniques, and master cast (P > .05). Conclusions: The most accurate impression technique utilized squared copings. The most accurate pouring technique for making the impression with tapered or squared copings utilized latex tubes. The pouring did not influence the accuracy of the stone casts when using splinted squared impression copings. Either the index technique or the use of squared coping combined with the latex-tube pouring technique are preferred methods for making implant-supported fixed restorations with dimensional accuracy.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent226-236
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?article_id=3305#.Ui9gMMbks_Y
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 23, n. 2, p. 226-236, 2008.
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.lattes8921196002764597
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-43149098067
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16528
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000255439300005
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.699
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,576
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdental implantationen
dc.subjectdental impression techniqueen
dc.subjectdental modelsen
dc.titleAccuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesisen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/jop/orderreprints.php
dcterms.rightsHolderQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
unesp.author.lattes8921196002764597
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: