Impact of tilted implants for implant-supported fixed partial dentures: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorBatista, Rhaslla Gonçalves
dc.contributor.authorFaé, Daniele Sorgatto
dc.contributor.authorBento, Victor Augusto Alves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Cléber Davi Del Rey Daltro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSouza Batista, Victor Eduardo de
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Juiz de Fora/Campus GV (UFJF/GV)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE)
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T13:39:16Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T13:39:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem: The use of tilted implants has been considered a suitable option for completely edentulous patients. However, consensus on their clinical performance is lacking, specifically for partial rehabilitation. Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the marginal bone loss and implant survival rate of tilted implants compared with those of axial implants for implant-supported fixed partial dentures (ISFPDs). Material and methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and ProQuest databases and reference lists for articles published until May 2022 was performed by 2 independent reviewers without language or publication date restrictions. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan version 5.4 program. Quality assessments were performed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Results: Nine studies were included, totaling 258 participants and 604 implants (269 tilted implants and 335 axial implants). No significant differences were found between the tilted and axial implants for the implant survival rate (P=.81; risk ratio: 1.14). However, higher marginal bone loss values were observed for tilted implants (P=.001; mean difference: 0.12 mm). No significant heterogeneity was observed in either analysis. Conclusions: No significant relationship was found between tilted and axial implants for ISFPD rehabilitation. However, tilted implants presented greater risks of marginal bone loss than axial implants.en
dc.description.affiliationGraduate student Department of Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de Fora/Campus GV (UFJF/GV), MG
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate student Program in Applied Health Sciences (PPGCAS) Federal University of Juiz de Fora/Campus GV (UFJF/GV), MG
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State Univeristy (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationProfessor Department Prosthodontics Presidente Prudente Dental School University of Western São Paulo (UNOESTE), SP
dc.description.affiliationProfessor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State Univeristy (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationProfessor Department of Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de Fora/Campus GV (UFJF/GV), MG
dc.description.affiliationUnespPostgraduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State Univeristy (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespProfessor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School São Paulo State Univeristy (UNESP), SP
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.015
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.015
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146990691
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/248273
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleImpact of tilted implants for implant-supported fixed partial dentures: A systematic review with meta-analysisen
dc.typeResenha
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0558-4239[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7350-2525[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8273-489X[7]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOA