Comparison between connective tissue graft and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix to treat single gingival recession: A data reanalysis of randomized clinical trials
dc.contributor.author | Miguel, Manuela Maria Viana [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferraz, Laís Fernanda Ferreira [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Rossato, Amanda [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Cintra, Tuana Mendonça Faria [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes | |
dc.contributor.author | Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Maryland School of Dentistry | |
dc.contributor.institution | College of Dentistry | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-02T03:34:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-02T03:34:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: There are few studies comparing xenogeneic acellular dermal matrixes (XDMs) with connective tissue graft (CTG) to treat single gingival recession (GR). The present study involved a reanalysis of previous studies and comparison of CTG or XDM to treat single RT1/GR. Materials and methods: Fifty patients from three previous randomized clinical trials treated either by CTG (n = 25) or XDM (n = 25) were evaluated after 6-month. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic parameters were assessed. Pearson's correlation and regression analyses were also performed. Results: Greater recession reduction (RecRed), percentage of root coverage (%RC), and complete root coverage (CRC) were observed in the CTG group (p ≤ 0.02). Gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized tissue width (KTW) gains were higher in the CTG group. The CTG group showed better esthetic at 6-month. Logistic analyses reported that GT([OR] = 1.6473) and papilla height (PH) (OR = 8.20) are predictors of CRC. GT*XDM interaction was a negative predictor of CRC (OR = 7.105−5). GT at baseline acted as a predictor of RecRed in both groups (p = 0.03). The XDM graft impacted RecRed and %RC negatively. Baseline PH was a predictor of %RC for both grafts. Conclusion: CTG was superior for treating RT1/GR, providing better root coverage outcomes and tissue gains over time. GT, PH, and graft type were classified as predictors of CRC. Clinical significance: CTG presented better outcomes to treat single RT1 gingival recession when compared to the XDM. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Division of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
dc.description.affiliation | Division of Operative Dentistry Dept. of General Dentistry University of Maryland School of Dentistry | |
dc.description.affiliation | University of Kentucky College of Dentistry | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Division of Periodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12936 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jerd.12936 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1708-8240 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1496-4155 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85131315149 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241910 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | connective tissue graft(s) | |
dc.subject | dental | |
dc.subject | esthetics | |
dc.subject | gingival recession | |
dc.subject | heterografts | |
dc.subject | mucogingival surgery | |
dc.title | Comparison between connective tissue graft and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix to treat single gingival recession: A data reanalysis of randomized clinical trials | en |
dc.type | Artigo | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-4828-3487[1] | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-4486-6335[2] | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-9354-9446[3] | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-2518-0135[5] | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-9468-0729[6] |