Randomized clinical trial of encapsulated and hand-mixed glassionomer ART restorations: One-year follow-up

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra
dc.contributor.authorFagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorModena, Karin Cristina da Silva
dc.contributor.authorCardia, Guilherme Saintive
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, Maria Fidela de Lima
dc.contributor.institutionFaculdade DeVry FACID
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Sagrado Coração
dc.contributor.institutionUniCesumar
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:17:29Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:17:29Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: This prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC; Riva Self-Cure, SDI), supplied in capsules or in powder/liquid kits and placed in Class I cavities in permanent molars by the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach. Material and Methods: A total of 80 restorations were randomly placed in 40 patients aged 11-15 years. Each patient received one restoration with each type of GIC. The restorations were evaluated after periods of 15 days (baseline), 6 months, and 1 year, according to ART criteria. Wilcoxon matched pairs, multivariate logistic regression, and Gehan-Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Patients were evaluated after 15 days (n=40), 6 months (n=34), and 1 year (n=29). Encapsulated GICs showed significantly superior clinical performance compared with hand-mixed GICs at baseline (p=0.017), 6 months (p=0.001), and 1 year (p=0.026). For hand-mixed GIC, a statistically significant difference was only observed over the period of baseline to 1 year (p=0.001). Encapsulated GIC presented statistically significant differences for the following periods: 6 months to 1 year (p=0.028) and baseline to 1 year (p=0.002). Encapsulated GIC presented superior cumulative survival rate than hand-mixed GIC over one year. Importantly, both GICs exhibited decreased survival over time. Conclusions: Encapsulated GIC promoted better ART performance, with an annual failure rate of 24%; in contrast, hand-mixed GIC demonstrated a failure rate of 42%.en
dc.description.affiliationGrupo Educacional DeVry Faculdade DeVry FACID
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationCentro de Ciências da Saúde Curso de Odontologia Universidade do Sagrado Coração
dc.description.affiliationUniCesumar
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Odontologia de Bauru Departamento de Dentística Endodontia e Materiais Odontológicos Universidade de São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0129
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science, v. 26.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0129
dc.identifier.fileS1678-77572018000100410.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1678-7765
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.scieloS1678-77572018000100410
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85040995537
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/175782
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,645
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectClinical trial
dc.subjectDental caries
dc.subjectGlass ionomer cements
dc.titleRandomized clinical trial of encapsulated and hand-mixed glassionomer ART restorations: One-year follow-upen
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos

Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S1678-77572018000100410.pdf
Tamanho:
460.38 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Coleções

Artigos - Odontologia Restauradora - FOA