Zygomatic bone: Anatomic bases for osseointegrated implant anchorage

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorRigolizzo, Maurício Bruhns
dc.contributor.authorCamilli, José Angelo
dc.contributor.authorFrancischone, Carlos Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorPadovani, Carlos Roberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBrånemark, Per-Ingvar
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Sagrado Coração de Bauru
dc.contributor.institutionMaster of Science School
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionBrånemark Osseointegration Center
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:19Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:19Z
dc.date.issued2005-05-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate zygomatic bone thickness considering a possible relationship between this parameter and cephalic index (Cl) for better use of Cl in the implant placement technique. Materials and Methods: Cl was calculated for 60 dry Brazilian skulls. The zygo matic bones of the skulls were divided into 13 standardized sections for measurement. Bilateral measurements of zygomatic bone thickness were made on dry skulls. Results: Sections 5, 6, 8, and 9 were appropriate for implant anchorage in terms of location. The mean thicknesses of these sections were 6.05 mm for section 5, 3.15 mm for section 6, 6.13 mm for section 8, and 4.75 mm for section 9. In only 1 section, section 8, did mean thickness on 1 side of of the skull differ significantly from mean thickness on the other side (P <.001). Discussion: For the relationship between quadrant thick ness and Cl, sections 6 and 8 varied independently of Cl. Section 5 associated with brachycephaly, and section 9 associated with subbrachycephaly, presented variations in the corresponding thickness. Conclusion: Based on the results, implants should be placed in sections 5 and 8, since they presented the greatest thickness, except in brachycephalic subjects, where thickness was greatest in section 5, and in subbrachycephalic subjects, where thickness was greatest in section 9. Cl did not prove to be an appropriate parameter for evaluating zygomatic bone thickness for this sampling.en
dc.description.affiliationBrånemark Osseointegration Center Universidade do Sagrado Coração de Bauru
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anatomy Universidade do Sagrado Coração de Bauru
dc.description.affiliationMaster of Science School Department of Implantology
dc.description.affiliationOperative Dentistry Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Statistics Universidade do Sagrado Coração de Bauru
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Statistics Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Botucatu
dc.description.affiliationBrånemark Osseointegration Center, Göteborg
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Statistics Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Botucatu
dc.format.extent441-447
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?article_id=1799
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 20, n. 3, p. 441-447, 2005.
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.lattes8727897080522289
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-21344474586
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68229
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000229786800012
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.699
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,576
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAtrophic maxilla
dc.subjectCephalic index
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectZygomatic bone
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectbone regeneration
dc.subjectbrachycephaly
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectcalculation
dc.subjectcephalometry
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcraniofacial synostosis
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthistology
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman tissue
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmaxilla
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectparameter
dc.subjectpathology
dc.subjectscoring system
dc.subjectskull
dc.subjectstandardization
dc.subjectstatistical significance
dc.subjectthickness
dc.subjecttooth implantation
dc.subjectzygoma
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectCephalometry
dc.subjectCraniosynostoses
dc.subjectDental Implantation, Endosseous
dc.subjectDental Implants
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOsseointegration
dc.subjectSkull
dc.subjectZygoma
dc.titleZygomatic bone: Anatomic bases for osseointegrated implant anchorageen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.quintpub.com/terms.php
unesp.author.lattes8727897080522289[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7719-9682[4]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Biociências, Botucatupt

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Bioestatística - IBB