Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Leão, Rafaella
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Cátia Maria Fonseca
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva Casado, Bruno Gustavo da
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUPE – University of Pernambuco
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:14:19Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:14:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: This review is to compare patient-satisfaction with ball-type overdenture attachment systems with others attachment systems. Material and methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018097234) and adheres the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for published articles were performed before October 2020. The PICO question was: “Do patients with a ball-type overdenture retention system have greater satisfaction, when compared to other attachment systems?” The evaluation of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results: After searching the databases, seven articles were selected out of a total of 2583. A total of 312 implants were placed in 139 patients, with a mean age of 65.9 years. The risk of bias in the included studies varied according to the different domains in a risk of uncertain bias or low bias risk. No difference was found between the ball attachment systems and the others systems, with respect to patient-satisfaction. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between the ball systems and another systems (P = 0.11; MD: 10.90; 95% CI: −2.55 to 24.35). Conclusions: Regarding patient general satisfaction, it was not possible to determine differences between the ball system and another types of attachment system for overdenture. The ball-type system was statistically superior only to the magnet system.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Dentistry School UNESP – São Paulo State University, R: José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça
dc.description.affiliationDentistry School UPE – University of Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics Dentistry School Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Dentistry School UNESP – São Paulo State University, R: José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.03.002
dc.identifier.citationSaudi Dental Journal.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.03.002
dc.identifier.issn1013-9052
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103737481
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208567
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSaudi Dental Journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCross-over studies
dc.subjectDenture precision attachment
dc.subjectOverdenture
dc.subjectPatient-satisfaction
dc.subjectProsthodontics
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.titleDo ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trialen
dc.typeResenha

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOA