Success Rates of Conventional Versus Endoscope-Assisted Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 12 Years and Younger

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorGalindo-Ferreiro, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorAkaishi, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Augusto
dc.contributor.authorKhandekar, Rajiv
dc.contributor.authorDossari, Saif
dc.contributor.authorDufaileej, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorGalvez-Ruiz, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorSchellini, Silvana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionKing Khalid Eye Specialist Hosp
dc.contributor.institutionComplejo Asistencial Palencia
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T17:16:35Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T17:16:35Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the success rates for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) treated with conventional probing versus endoscope-assisted probing. Methods: A retrospective nonrandomized comparison of the success rates in children (0 to 12 years) with CNLDO who underwent conventional probing or endoscope-assisted probing. Success was defined as absence of tearing or negative fluorescein dye disappearance test. Stent was evaluated. Results: A total of 270 patients with CNLDO comprised the study population. The mean age was 37 months in the conventional probing group and 48.5 months in the endoscope-assisted probing group. The subjective and objective success rates were 76.1% and 75.9%, respec-tively, in the conventional probing group and 95.7% and 95.7%, respectively, in the endoscope-assisted probing group. The success rates were higher for both methods in the endoscope-assisted probing group (P <.005). The success rate decreased in older children in the conventional probing group (100% < 6 months; 62.5% > 48 months) and remained stable in the endoscope-assisted probing group (100% < 6 months; 97% > 48 months). Stent did not improve success. Conclusions: Endoscope-assisted probing increased success in older children and children with bilateral obstruction.en
dc.description.affiliationKing Khalid Eye Specialist Hosp, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
dc.description.affiliationComplejo Asistencial Palencia, Dept Ophthalmol, Palencia, Spain
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Sch Med Ribeirao Preto, Dept Ophthalmol Otorhinolaryngol & Head & Neck Su, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent292-299
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20160610-02
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. Thorofare: Slack Inc, v. 53, n. 5, p. 292-299, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.3928/01913913-20160610-02
dc.identifier.issn0191-3913
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/162411
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000393047200008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSlack Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,474
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleSuccess Rates of Conventional Versus Endoscope-Assisted Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 12 Years and Youngeren
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderSlack Inc

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Oftalmo/Otorrino e CCP - FMB