Bonding strength between a hard chairside reline resin and a denture base material as influenced by surface treatment

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorLeles, C. R.
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Ana Lucia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVergani, Carlos Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGiampaolo, E. T.
dc.contributor.authorPavarina, Ana Claudia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:46:22Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:46:22Z
dc.date.issued2001-12-01
dc.description.abstractDirect relining of dentures made with hard chairside reline resins is faster than laboratory-processed reline systems and the patient is not without the prosthesis for the time necessary to perform the laboratory procedures. However, a weak bond between the autopolymerizing acrylic reline resins and the denture base material has been observed. This study evaluated the effect of six different surface treatments on the bond strength between a hard chairside reline acrylic resin and ia heat-cured acrylic resin. Specimens of the heat-cured acrylic resin were divided into seven groups. one of these groups remained intact. In the other groups, a 10-mm square section was removed from the centre of each specimen. The bonding surfaces were then treated with (i) methyl methacrylate monomer, (ii) isobutyl methacrylate monomer, (iii) chloroform, (iv) acetone, (v) experimental adhesive and (vi) no surface treatment-control group. Kooliner acrylic resin was packed,into the square sections and polymerized. The bonding strength was evaluated by a three-point loading test. The results were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey multiple range test at a 5% level of significance. No significant difference was found between the surface treatment with Lucitone 550 monomer or chloroform, but both were stronger than the majority of the other groups. The bond strength provided by all the surface treatments was lower than that of the intact heat-cured resin.en
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Fac Odontol Araraquara, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Araraquara Dent Sch, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent1153-1157
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00786.x
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral Rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, v. 28, n. 12, p. 1153-1157, 2001.
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00786.x
dc.identifier.issn0305-182X
dc.identifier.lattes8000248781842587
dc.identifier.lattes3003130522427820
dc.identifier.lattes5737127334248549
dc.identifier.lattes8867670539105403
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7375-4714
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/16406
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000173046100012
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.051
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectreline resinpt
dc.subjectbond strengthpt
dc.subjectdenture base resinpt
dc.subjectremovable prosthodonticspt
dc.titleBonding strength between a hard chairside reline resin and a denture base material as influenced by surface treatmenten
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
dcterms.rightsHolderBlackwell Publishing Ltd
unesp.author.lattes8000248781842587[2]
unesp.author.lattes3003130522427820[3]
unesp.author.lattes5737127334248549
unesp.author.lattes8867670539105403[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7375-4714[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9231-1994[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2718-428X[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:

Coleções

Artigos - Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOAR