Logotipo do repositório

Intercropping techniques improve pasture quality and beef cattle performance compared to livestock systems

dc.contributor.authorBonacim, Pedro Mielli
dc.contributor.authorde Paz, Claudia Cristina Paro
dc.contributor.authorMendonça, Gabriela Geraldi
dc.contributor.authorMoitinho, Mara Regina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAugusto, Jeferson Garcia
dc.contributor.authorMenegatto, Leonardo Sartori
dc.contributor.authorKunrath, Taise Robinson
dc.contributor.authorSalles, Márcia Saladini Vieira
dc.contributor.authorSimili, Flávia Fernanda
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-08T17:07:22Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-03
dc.description.abstractIn integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS), pasture is intercropped with crops to provide grain for feed and forage mass for grazing. Although scientific results have shown the benefits of using ICLS instead of conventional livestock systems, few studies have investigated the best way to implement these integrated systems. The hypothesis of this study was that ICLS improves the nutritional value of forage and beef cattle performance. The aim of the study was to evaluate (1) different ways to intercrop maize and Marandu grass for pasture establishment, and (2) the effects of intercropping maize and Marandu grass on herbage mass, nutritional value and beef cattle performance. The control treatment consisting exclusively of Marandu grass pasture (livestock system, LS) was compared to four ICLS: maize plus Marandu grass sown simultaneously without herbicide (ICLS-1); maize plus Marandu grass sown simultaneously with herbicide (ICLS-2); maize plus Marandu grass in lagged sowing (ICLS-3), and maize plus Marandu grass sown simultaneously in maize rows and inter-rows with herbicide (ICLS-4). A randomised block design with five treatments and three replicates was used. The experiment was carried out in a field of 13.35 ha, divided into 15 paddocks of 0.89 ha each. The animals grazed for 370 days under continuous stocking. A put-and-take approach was used to adjust stocking rates throughout the year. Herbage mass was higher in the LS treatment than in ICLS-2 and ICLS-4 as a result of the greater accumulation of dead material. Light interception and leaf area index were higher in ICLS-4, in which Marandu grass was sown in maize rows and inter-rows, promoting better pasture establishment. Crude protein content of Marandu grass leaves was greater in the ICLS-4 treatment compared to LS and ICLS-2. Stem crude protein content was greater in ICLS-4 compared to LS, ICLS-1 and ICLS-2. The mean body weight gain was lower in the LS treatment (410 kg) compared to ICLS-2 (429 kg), ICLS-3 (437 kg) and ICLS-4 (426 kg). Intercrop maize with Marandu grass can be used for pasture establishment. The treatment ICLS-4 using maize plus Marandu grass sown simultaneously in maize rows and inter-rows with herbicide provides better pasture establishment and nutritive value.
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Zootecnia, Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo University, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (FCAV–UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (FCAV–UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1189851154
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1189851154
dc.identifier.doi10.2989/10220119.2025.2459892
dc.identifier.issn1022-0119
dc.identifier.issn1727-9380
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7844-6550
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7267-4552
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9401-6294
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1068-5715
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5027-6449
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9874-0511
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6343-0647
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8286-2672
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/323560
dc.publisherNational Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
dc.relation.ispartofAfrican Journal of Range and Forage Science; n. 2; v. 42; p. 177-187
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsclosed
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleIntercropping techniques improve pasture quality and beef cattle performance compared to livestock systems
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos