Publicação:
Randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating connective tissue graft plus resin-modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: 2-year follow-up

dc.contributor.authorSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine
dc.contributor.authorFeitosa, Daniela da Silva
dc.contributor.authorCasati, Marcio Zaffalon
dc.contributor.authorNociti Júnior, Francisco Humberto
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Antônio Wilson
dc.contributor.authorSallum, Enilson Antônio
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de Pernambuco (UPE)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:30:35Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:30:35Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the 2-year term results of gingival recession (GR) associated with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) treated by connective tissue graft (CTG) alone or in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer restoration (CTG+R). Methods: Thirty-six patients with Miller Class I buccal GR associated with NCCLs completed the follow-up. The defects were randomly assigned to receive either CTG or CTG+R. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), relative GR, clinical attachment level (CAL), and cervical lesion height coverage were measured at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant gains in CAL and soft-tissue coverage. The differences between groups were not statistically significant in BOP, PD, relative GR, or CAL after 2 years. Cervical lesion height coverage was 79.31% ± 18.51% for CTG and 71.95% ± 13.25% for CTG+R (P >0.05). Estimated root coverage was 91.56% ± 11.74% for CTG and 93.29% ± 7.97% for CTG+R (P ≥0.05). Conclusions: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that both procedures provide comparable soft tissue coverage after 2 years of follow-up.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology College of Dentistry State University of São Paulo, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP. 12245-000
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Medicine Pernambuco Dental School University of Pernambuco, Recife, PE
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontics Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas, São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120447
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontology, v. 84, n. 9, 2013.
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2013.120447
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.lattes7008114923397947
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84883426953
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/76473
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000328685400001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr3.392
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,408
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental esthetics
dc.subjectDental restoration
dc.subjectGingival recession
dc.subjectGlass ionomer cements
dc.subjectPermanent
dc.subjectTooth abrasion
dc.subjectTooth cervix
dc.titleRandomized controlled clinical trial evaluating connective tissue graft plus resin-modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: 2-year follow-upen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.joponline.org/userimages/ContentEditor/1124388816475/Instructions_to_Authors.pdf
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes7008114923397947
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - ICTpt

Arquivos