Logo do repositório

Can the size and the luting material influence in the bond strength of the fiberglass post to dentin?

dc.contributor.authorde Lima, Leonardo Custódio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Jean Soares [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho, Ronaldo Luís Almeida [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJunqueira, Rafafel Binato
dc.contributor.authorde Carvalho, Rodrigo Furtado
dc.contributor.authorKimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:58:41Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-10
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the influence of lengths and different luting agents on the bond strength of fiberglass posts’ adhesion to dentin. Methods: Sixty single-root bovine teeth were endodontically treated and included in polyether and acrilyc resin to simulate a periodontal ligament. These were divided into 6 groups according to the post lengths (6, 10 or 14 mm) and luting agents (self-adhesive dual resin cement – U; or etch-and-rinse dual resin cement – A): U6, U10, U14, A6, A19, and A14. All fiberglass posts were cemented according to manufacturer instructions. After this, mechanical aging was performed (1.2x106 cycles; 4 Hz, 90 N). The push-out specimens were then conducted (2.0 ± 0.1 mm), with the test executed in a universal machine (10 kgf at 0.5 mm/min). Data obtained were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s test. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in bond strength between the groups due to the type of luting agent (p > 0.05). However, the isolated post-length factor showed significantly different results for the U groups (p < 0.05). The U10 group showed similar union values to U6 but statistically inferior to U14. Conclusion: bond strength of fiberglass posts of the same length as the dentin presented no differences according to the luting agent, but the post-length property influenced the bond strength when self-adhesive resin cement was used.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São José dos Campos Dental School Institute of Science and Technology Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF) Campus Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São José dos Campos Dental School Institute of Science and Technology Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 118157/2014-0
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.7308/aodontol/2020.56.e14
dc.identifier.citationArquivos em Odontologia, v. 56.
dc.identifier.doi10.7308/aodontol/2020.56.e14
dc.identifier.issn2178-1990
dc.identifier.issn1516-0939
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180202409
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/301576
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofArquivos em Odontologia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFiber post
dc.subjectpush out
dc.subjectresin cement
dc.titleCan the size and the luting material influence in the bond strength of the fiberglass post to dentin?en
dc.titleO comprimento e o tipo de cimento podem influenciar na adesão do pino de fibra de vidro a dentina?pt
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos