Logotipo do repositório

Forest cover outweighs restoration strategy in explaining Euglossini beta diversity in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil

dc.contributor.authorda Silva Carneiro, Lázaro
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRicketts, Taylor
dc.contributor.authorMartello, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorFrantine-Silva, Wilson
dc.contributor.authorGaglianone, Maria Cristina
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T14:06:09Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-01
dc.description.abstractEcosystem restoration is essential to recover biodiversity and to maintain ecosystem services. The outcomes of active and passive restoration strategies should be evaluated through ecological indicators, of which bees have been widely used. Orchid bees (Euglossini) are essential pollinators in Neotropical ecosystems and respond negatively to landscape disturbances. Understanding how forest cover (%) and landscape heterogeneity influence their communities is essential for guiding restoration efforts. Moreover, assessing how active restoration and natural regeneration shape the orchid bee community recovery compared to forest control sites is crucial for conservation strategies. We analyzed the effects of restoration strategy (active restoration and natural regeneration), forest cover (%), and landscape compositional heterogeneity on species composition and beta diversity components of euglossine communities in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. We found that forest cover (%) and landscape heterogeneity significantly influence species composition, turnover, and nestedness, while restoration strategy has no significant effect on bee communities. Landscapes with a higher forest cover (> 50 %) supported forest-dependent species, while a low forest cover (< 25 %) favored species with higher environmental plasticity. The turnover and nestedness components responded differently to variations in forest cover (%) and landscape heterogeneity, depending on the sites pairwise. In addition, while assessing the effect of forest cover (%) on species occurrence probability, we found a positive response for some euglossine bees, such as Euglossa iopoecila and Euglossa ignita. These results emphasize the role of forest restoration, regardless of the strategy, in recovering euglossine regional diversity and reestablishing ecosystem services. Our findings highlight the importance of increasing forest cover at the landscape scale to enhance the outcomes of active restoration and natural regeneration strategies, thereby supporting restoration success and biodiversity conservation in fragmented tropical landscapes.
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ciências Ambientais (LCA), Centro de Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, 28013602, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationGund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA
dc.description.affiliationUMR BIOGECO, French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE)/Université de Bordeaux, Pessac, 33615, France
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia Espacial e Conservação (LEEC), Departamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, 13506900, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCentro de Estudos Ambientais (CEA), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, 13506900, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, England, United Kingdom
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, PR, 86057970, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespLaboratório de Ecologia Espacial e Conservação (LEEC), Departamento de Biodiversidade, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, 13506900, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespCentro de Estudos Ambientais (CEA), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, 13506900, Brazil
dc.identifierhttps://app.dimensions.ai/details/publication/pub.1193186971
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1193186971
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111509
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.issn1873-2917
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4312-202X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9688-7977
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1243-9750
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4293-0471
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9206-2895
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/322038
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Conservation; v. 312; p. 111509
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsclosed
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.titleForest cover outweighs restoration strategy in explaining Euglossini beta diversity in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Centro de Estudos Ambientais, Rio Claropt

Arquivos