Different surface treatment strategies on etchable CAD-CAM materials: Part II—Effect on the bond strength
| dc.contributor.author | Porto, Thiago Soares | |
| dc.contributor.author | Medeiros da Silva, Italo Guimaraes | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Freitas Vallerini, Bruna [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fernando de Goes, Mario | |
| dc.contributor.institution | The Ohio State University | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Case Western Reserve University | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-29T08:38:53Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-04-29T08:38:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-01-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Statement of problem: Bonding to recently launched polymer-based computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials has been challenging. Evidence regarding etching strategies for dual-phase CAD-CAM materials is sparse, but adequate bonding is crucial for the clinical success and longevity of a restoration. Purpose: The purpose of this 2-part in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the effect of surface treatment strategies on the microshear bond strength and work of adhesion of polymer-based and ceramic materials. In addition, chemical elements present on the surface and the interface morphology after using those strategies were also assessed. Materials and methods: Two CAD-CAM polymer and 1 CAD-CAM ceramic materials were selected for this in vitro study. The materials were subjected to different surface treatment strategies, including airborne-particle abrasion and the application of 9% hydrofluoric acid. Specimens were submitted to microshear bond strength before and after thermocycling, and the failure mode was classified. The work of adhesion was calculated based on the water-to-air surface tension of 72.8 mN.m-1 and the Young- Dupré equation. The surfaces were submitted to energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and the interfaces were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. Data were subjected to 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05). Results: The highest microshear bond strength means were observed for the polymer-based materials when hydrofluoric acid or airborne-particle abrasion was applied. The 3 materials tested showed a decrease in microshear bond strength after thermocycling, except for applying airborne-particle abrasion to 1 of the polymer-based material tested. The ceramic material tested showed a high microshear bond strength with the application of airborne-particle abrasion and hydrofluoric acid combined. The work of adhesion varied across the materials and presented high means when hydrofluoric acid was used. Conclusions: A combination of airborne-particle abrasion plus hydrofluoric acid should be considered for polymer-based or feldspathic ceramic CAD-CAM materials. In this in vitro study, both etching procedures combined produced higher bonding values for all materials tested. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry College of Dentistry The Ohio State University | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Researcher Department of Macromolecular Science and Engineering School of Engineering Case Western Reserve University | |
| dc.description.affiliation | PhD Candidate Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara School of Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Restorative Dentistry (Dental Materials Area) Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas (UNICAMP) | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | PhD Candidate Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara School of Dentistry Sao Paulo State University (UNESP) | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.007 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. | |
| dc.identifier.dimensions | pub.1145127110 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.10.007 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1097-6841 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0022-3913 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-7806-8476 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 35101273 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85123713292 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230296 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso aberto | pt |
| dc.rights.sourceRights | oa_all | |
| dc.rights.sourceRights | green | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.source | Dimensions | |
| dc.title | Different surface treatment strategies on etchable CAD-CAM materials: Part II—Effect on the bond strength | en |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isDepartmentOfPublication | 3936e2e2-946a-42ab-8b9d-9521513200fc | |
| relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 3936e2e2-946a-42ab-8b9d-9521513200fc | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0 | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-7806-8476[1] | |
| unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquara | pt |
| unesp.department | Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOAR | pt |

